Suppr超能文献

将普鲁卡因胺和N-乙酰普鲁卡因胺的荧光免疫测定法与液相色谱法进行比较。

Fluoroimmunoassays for procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide compared with a liquid-chromatographic method.

作者信息

MacKichan J J, Coyle J D, Shields B J, Boudoulas H, Lima J J

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1984 May;30(5):768-73.

PMID:6201304
Abstract

We measured procainamide and its active metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), in 80 sera from 37 patients by a new fluorimmunoassay procedure and an established "high-performance" liquid-chromatographic method. Additive and proportional differences between the methods were 0.07 mg/L and 9%, respectively, for procainamide and 0.62 mg/L and 16% for NAPA. Between-day CVs by the chromatographic and immunoassay methods, respectively, were 3.9% and 2.2% for procainamide at a concentration of 6 mg/L, and 5.1% and 1.2% for NAPA (14 mg/L). We applied a modification of the fluoroimmunoassay for determination of procainamide concentrations, using sera obtained during a pharmacokinetic study, and demonstrated excellent agreement with the chromatographic method.

摘要

我们采用一种新的荧光免疫分析法和一种既定的“高效”液相色谱法,对37例患者的80份血清样本中的普鲁卡因酰胺及其活性代谢物N - 乙酰普鲁卡因酰胺(NAPA)进行了测定。两种方法之间,普鲁卡因酰胺的加和性差异和比例性差异分别为0.07 mg/L和9%,NAPA则分别为0.62 mg/L和16%。色谱法和免疫分析法的日间变异系数方面,浓度为6 mg/L的普鲁卡因酰胺分别为3.9%和2.2%,浓度为14 mg/L的NAPA分别为5.1%和1.2%。我们对荧光免疫分析法进行了改进,用于测定药代动力学研究期间采集的血清样本中的普鲁卡因酰胺浓度,并证明与色谱法具有良好的一致性。

相似文献

5
Clinical evaluation of the EMIT procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide assay.
Ther Drug Monit. 1979;1(1):47-56. doi: 10.1097/00007691-197901000-00005.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验