RADOSEVIC Z, SARIC M, BERITIC T, KNEZEVIC J
Br J Ind Med. 1961 Jul;18(3):222-30. doi: 10.1136/oem.18.3.222.
Kidney damage due to lead is still an interesting problem of industrial toxicology. In spite of abundant literature data, much still remains to be explained. There are controversial opinions, not only on the type of renal lesions due to lead, but also on whether lead affects the kidney at all. In this paper our clinical observations on the effect of lead upon the kidney in 53 patients suffering from lead poisoning are presented. In 44 patients (40 men and four women) lead poisoning was due to occupation, and in nine (five men and four women) to the use of lead-glazed pottery. The length of exposure varied from two months to 35 years. In all cases the diagnosis of lead poisoning was made clinically and confirmed by laboratory tests. Permanent changes in the form of chronic nephropathy were observed in only two patients. These were the two cases in which exposure to lead was the longest and most intense. Twenty-three patients showed functional renal lesions tending to normalize. In addition to the cases of organic nephropathy, blood pressure was persistently raised in one further patient; in two patients a raised blood pressure was observed only in the acute stage of poisoning. On the basis of these findings we consider that lead intoxication can cause renal lesions. These lesions are for the most part functional and temporary. In cases of long and severe exposure and repeated lead intoxication, organic renal lesions seem possible. The disturbances of renal function observed in this study may be ascribed to disordered intrarenal circulation, due to the spastic effect of lead on intrarenal blood vessels, and to a direct toxic or indirect hypoxic effect of lead on the tubules. When investigating renal function, we have observed that the timing of individual tests is of paramount importance. Some lesions are subject to changes in the natural course of lead poisoning, and unless this is borne in mind, apparently contradictory results may be obtained.
铅导致的肾损伤仍是工业毒理学中一个引人关注的问题。尽管有大量的文献资料,但仍有许多有待解释之处。不仅在铅所致肾损害的类型上存在争议观点,而且在铅是否真的会影响肾脏这一问题上也存在争议。本文介绍了我们对53例铅中毒患者铅对肾脏影响的临床观察。44例患者(40名男性和4名女性)的铅中毒是职业性的,9例患者(5名男性和4名女性)的铅中毒是由于使用铅釉陶器。接触铅的时间从两个月到35年不等。所有病例均通过临床诊断并经实验室检查确诊。仅在两名患者中观察到了以慢性肾病形式出现的永久性改变。这两名患者是接触铅时间最长、程度最严重的。23例患者表现出功能性肾损害,有趋于恢复正常的倾向。除了器质性肾病病例外,另有一名患者血压持续升高;两名患者仅在中毒急性期观察到血压升高。基于这些发现,我们认为铅中毒可导致肾损害。这些损害大多是功能性的且是暂时的。在长期、严重接触铅以及反复铅中毒的情况下,器质性肾损害似乎是有可能的。本研究中观察到的肾功能障碍可能归因于铅对肾内血管的痉挛作用导致的肾内循环紊乱,以及铅对肾小管的直接毒性或间接缺氧作用。在研究肾功能时,我们观察到各项检查的时机至关重要。某些损害会在铅中毒的自然病程中发生变化,除非牢记这一点,否则可能会得到明显相互矛盾的结果。