Thakkar N S, Potten C S
CRC Department of Epithelial Biology, Paterson Institute of Cancer Research, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, U.K.
Biochem Pharmacol. 1992 Apr 15;43(8):1683-91. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(92)90697-h.
The processes involved in cell killing by Adriamycin (ADR) and other agents that interact with topoisomerase II are unclear. To investigate the mode of ADR cytotoxicity in vivo, we have investigated the effects of the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide (CH), on cell killing by ADR in the murine intestinal tract. We have used morphological criteria to assay the cell death. ADR rapidly induces cell death in this tissue that has the morphology of apoptosis or programmed cell death. CH, when administered immediately after ADR, reduced the incidence of cell death by approximately 81% at 3 hr and approximately 51% at 6 hr after treatment. The inhibitor was only effective when administered within 0.5 hr of ADR suggesting that critical events leading to cell death may occur during this period. The inhibitor did not interfere with the ADR uptake or retention. Significant positive correlation was observed between protein and DNA synthesis inhibition (as measured by precursor uptake) and apoptosis inhibition. CH delayed progression of cells through all phases of the cell cycle except mitosis. However, ADR also had a similar effect, suggesting that progression through the cell cycle is not necessary for the expression of apoptosis. The effectiveness of CH in apoptosis inhibition, even when administered 0.5 hr after the ADR, coupled with the rapid uptake of ADR by the intestinal epithelium suggests that the mode of inhibition is unlikely to be modulation of cellular targets of ADR such as topoisomerase II or inhibition of formation of ADR-topoisomerase II complex. These data indicate that topoisomerase II-interacting agents such as ADR may induce apoptosis; the processes leading to cell death in this situation are thought to be gene dependent and require protein synthesis for their expression. Thus, the cytoprotective effect of CH may be due directly to the inhibition of protein synthesis.
阿霉素(ADR)及其他与拓扑异构酶II相互作用的药物所涉及的细胞杀伤过程尚不清楚。为了研究ADR在体内的细胞毒性作用方式,我们研究了蛋白质合成抑制剂环己酰亚胺(CH)对ADR在小鼠肠道中细胞杀伤作用的影响。我们使用形态学标准来检测细胞死亡情况。ADR能迅速在该组织中诱导细胞死亡,其具有凋亡或程序性细胞死亡的形态。CH在ADR给药后立即使用时,在治疗后3小时可使细胞死亡发生率降低约81%,6小时降低约51%。该抑制剂仅在ADR给药后0.5小时内使用才有效,这表明导致细胞死亡的关键事件可能在此期间发生。该抑制剂不干扰ADR的摄取或滞留。在蛋白质和DNA合成抑制(以前体摄取来衡量)与凋亡抑制之间观察到显著的正相关。CH延缓了细胞通过除有丝分裂外的细胞周期所有阶段的进程。然而,ADR也有类似作用,这表明通过细胞周期的进程对于凋亡的表达并非必要。CH即使在ADR给药后0.5小时使用仍能有效抑制凋亡,再加上肠道上皮细胞对ADR的快速摄取,这表明抑制模式不太可能是对ADR的细胞靶点如拓扑异构酶II的调节或对ADR - 拓扑异构酶II复合物形成的抑制。这些数据表明,像ADR这样与拓扑异构酶II相互作用的药物可能诱导凋亡;在这种情况下导致细胞死亡的过程被认为是基因依赖性的,并且其表达需要蛋白质合成。因此,CH的细胞保护作用可能直接归因于对蛋白质合成的抑制。