Scheerlinck J P, Lasters I, Claessens M, De Maeyer M, Pio F, Delhaise P, Wodak S J
Department of Cellular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Proteins. 1992 Apr;12(4):299-313. doi: 10.1002/prot.340120402.
A systematic survey of seven parallel alpha/beta barrel protein domains, based on exhaustive structural comparisons, reveals that a sizable proportion of the alpha beta loops in these proteins--20 out of a total of 49--belong to either one of two loop types previously described by Thornton and co-workers. Six loops are of the alpha beta 1 type, with one residue between the alpha-helix and beta-strand, and 13 are of the alpha beta 3 type, with three residues between the helix and the strand. Protein fragments embedding the identified loops, and termed alpha beta connections since they contain parts of the flanking helix and strand, have been analyzed in detail revealing that each type of connection has a distinct set of conserved structural features. The orientation of the beta-strand relative to the helix and loop portions is different owing to a very localized difference in backbone conformation. In alpha beta 1 connections, the chain enters the beta-strand via a residue adopting an extended conformation, while in alpha beta 3 it does so via a residue in a near alpha-helical conformation. Other conserved structural features include distinct patterns of side chain orientation relative to the beta-sheet surface and of main chain H-bonds in the loop and the beta-strand moieties. Significant differences also occur in packing interactions of conserved hydrophobic residues situated in the last turn of the helix. Yet the alpha-helix surface of both types of connections adopts similar orientations relative to the barrel sheet surface. Our results suggest furthermore that conserved hydrophobic residues along the sequence of the connections, may be correlated more with specific patterns of interactions made with neighboring helices and sheet strands than with helix/strand packing within the connection itself. A number of intriguing observations are also made on the distribution of the identified alpha beta 1 and alpha beta 3 loops within the alpha/beta-barrel motifs. They often occur adjacent to each other; alpha beta 3 loops invariably involve even numbered beta-strands, while alpha beta 1 loops involve preferentially odd beta-strands; all the analyzed proteins contain at least one alpha beta 3 loop in the first half of the eightfold alpha/beta barrel. Possible origins of all these observations, and their relevance to the stability and folding of parallel alpha/beta barrel motifs are discussed.
基于详尽的结构比较,对七个平行的α/β桶状蛋白结构域进行的系统调查显示,这些蛋白中相当一部分αβ环(总共49个环中有20个)属于桑顿及其同事先前描述的两种环类型之一。六个环是αβ1型,在α螺旋和β链之间有一个残基,13个是αβ3型,在螺旋和链之间有三个残基。嵌入已识别环的蛋白质片段,由于它们包含侧翼螺旋和链的部分,因此被称为αβ连接,已被详细分析,结果表明每种连接类型都有一组独特的保守结构特征。由于主链构象存在非常局部的差异,β链相对于螺旋和环部分的方向不同。在αβ1连接中,链通过采用伸展构象的残基进入β链,而在αβ3连接中,链通过接近α螺旋构象的残基进入β链。其他保守结构特征包括相对于β片层表面的侧链取向以及环和β链部分中的主链氢键的独特模式。位于螺旋最后一圈的保守疏水残基的堆积相互作用也存在显著差异。然而,两种连接类型的α螺旋表面相对于桶状片层表面采用相似的取向。我们的结果还表明,沿着连接序列的保守疏水残基,可能与与相邻螺旋和片层链形成的特定相互作用模式的相关性更大,而不是与连接本身内的螺旋/链堆积相关。关于已识别的αβ1和αβ3环在α/β桶状基序内的分布,也有一些有趣的观察结果。它们经常彼此相邻出现;αβ3环总是涉及偶数编号的β链,而αβ1环优先涉及奇数β链;所有分析的蛋白质在八重α/β桶的前半部分至少包含一个αβ3环。讨论了所有这些观察结果的可能起源及其与平行α/β桶状基序的稳定性和折叠的相关性。