Suppr超能文献

使用革兰氏染色涂片对重症监护病房患者进行床边感染筛查。

Bed-side infection screening of ICU patients using gram stained smears.

作者信息

Huemer G, Graninger W, Mauritz W

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and General Intensive Care Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992 May;9(3):229-33.

PMID:1376252
Abstract

Bronchial, abdominal or pleural aspirates (n = 364) collected from 165 ICU patients were both cultivated and evaluated microscopically using Gram stained smears, and the results were compared: 331 aspirates (91%) were classified correctly. Fungi were confirmed in all cases (21/21, sensitivity and specificity 100%). Gram-negative findings (n = 66) had a specificity of 97% (2/66 reclassified as Gram positive by culture): 21/85 Gram-negative cultures were overlooked by the Gram method (sensitivity 75%). Of 106 Gram-positive results, culture was negative in 10/106 and 7/106 were diagnosed as Gram-negative (specificity 84%). Sensitivity was 98% (only 2/91 not detected by the Gram technique). In 171 cases, no organisms were seen; specificity was 92% (Gram-negative bacteria cultivated in 14/171). Sensitivity was 94% (10/167 misdiagnosed as Gram-positive). Gram diagnoses were available 63 +/- 14 h prior to the culture test results. Treatment decisions based upon the Gram results were correct in 90% (326/364). It is concluded that Gram stained smears are a valuable tool for bed-side infection screening in ICU patients.

摘要

从165名重症监护病房患者采集的支气管、腹部或胸腔抽吸物(n = 364),既进行了培养,又使用革兰氏染色涂片进行了显微镜评估,并对结果进行了比较:331份抽吸物(91%)分类正确。所有病例(21/21)均确诊有真菌,敏感性和特异性均为100%。革兰氏阴性结果(n = 66)的特异性为97%(2/66经培养重新分类为革兰氏阳性):革兰氏方法漏检了21/85的革兰氏阴性培养物(敏感性75%)。在106份革兰氏阳性结果中,培养为阴性的有10/106,7/106被诊断为革兰氏阴性(特异性84%)。敏感性为98%(革兰氏技术仅未检测出2/91)。在171例中未发现微生物;特异性为92%(171例中有14例培养出革兰氏阴性菌)。敏感性为94%(10/167被误诊为革兰氏阳性)。革兰氏诊断结果比培养测试结果提前63±14小时可得。基于革兰氏结果做出的治疗决策90%(326/364)是正确的。结论是,革兰氏染色涂片是重症监护病房患者床边感染筛查的一项有价值的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验