Suppr超能文献

使用差异荧光染色法检测菌尿症。

The use of a differential fluorescent staining method to detect bacteriuria.

作者信息

Ciancaglini Ettore, Fazii Paolo, Sforza Giuseppe Riario

机构信息

Clinical Pathology, "Spirito Santo " Hospital, Pescara, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2004;50(11-12):685-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This report describes a differential staining method which distinguishes gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria in fluorescence. Gram-positive bacteria appear yellow and gram-negative bacteria appear green.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The method is based on two fluorochromes, one acting in the wavelength of red, i.e. the acridine orange, and another acting in the wavelength of green, i.e. the fluorescein, which together form a red/ green system. In this report we compared the accuracy of the differential fluorescent staining method and the Gram stain in screening for bacteriuria, as detected by conventional cultures.

RESULTS

A total of 1487 urine samples were tested. 289 cultures were positive. 237 specimens grew a single organism at 10(5) and 10(4) CFU/ml. 224 smears were detected by the differential fluorescent staining method and 162 were detected by Gram stain. 1198 samples failed to grow organisms at 10(5) and 10(4) CFU/ml. 107 smears were falsely positive by the fluorescent staining procedure and 289 were falsely positive by the Gram stain. On the basis of the culture results, the sensitivity of the differential fluorescent staining method was 94.5% and that of the Gram stain 68.3%. The specificity of the fluorescent staining procedure was 91.6% and that of the Gram stain 75.8%. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value of the fluorescent staining method were 67.6% and 98.8%, respectively. Those of the Gram stain were 35.9% and 92.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of microbiological and chemical techniques are available to identify bacteria in urine. This fluorescent staining method represents a simple, rapid, reliable method with low-running costs. The main advantage of this technique is that it enables the microbiologist to exclude the presence of bacteria in the urine within a short time after specimen receipt and to eliminate a large number of specimens for culture with significant cost saving. Another advantage of the method is that it allows to distinguish gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria in positive slides on the same day the sample is obtained. The stained smears were easily interpreted, even when the bacterial counts in the specimen were low.

摘要

背景

本报告描述了一种在荧光下区分革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的鉴别染色方法。革兰氏阳性菌呈黄色,革兰氏阴性菌呈绿色。

材料与方法

该方法基于两种荧光染料,一种作用于红色波长,即吖啶橙,另一种作用于绿色波长,即荧光素,它们共同构成一个红/绿系统。在本报告中,我们比较了鉴别荧光染色法和革兰氏染色法在筛查菌尿症方面的准确性,菌尿症通过传统培养法检测。

结果

共检测了1487份尿液样本。289份培养结果为阳性。237份标本在10⁵和10⁴CFU/ml时培养出单一微生物。鉴别荧光染色法检测到224份涂片,革兰氏染色法检测到162份涂片。1198份样本在10⁵和10⁴CFU/ml时未培养出微生物。荧光染色法有107份涂片假阳性,革兰氏染色法有289份涂片假阳性。根据培养结果,鉴别荧光染色法的敏感性为94.5%,革兰氏染色法为68.3%。荧光染色法的特异性为91.6%,革兰氏染色法为75.8%。荧光染色法的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为67.6%和98.8%。革兰氏染色法的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为35.9%和92.3%。

结论

有多种微生物学和化学技术可用于鉴定尿液中的细菌。这种荧光染色法是一种简单、快速、可靠且运行成本低的方法。该技术的主要优点是,微生物学家能够在收到标本后的短时间内排除尿液中细菌的存在,并排除大量需要培养的标本,从而显著节省成本。该方法的另一个优点是,在获得样本的同一天,它能够在阳性载玻片上区分革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌。即使标本中的细菌计数较低,染色涂片也易于解读。

相似文献

4
Gram staining.革兰氏染色法。
Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2005 Oct;Appendix 3:Appendix 3C. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs00.
7
[Reviews for Gram stain].[革兰氏染色的综述]
Rinsho Byori. 2002 May;50(5):449-54.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验