Analysis of local electrogram characteristics correlated with successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways.

UNLABELLED

Due to the limited myocardial lesions produced by radiofrequency current, the ablation of accessory pathways (AP) requires precise localization of such connections. The purpose of this study was to ascertain which characteristic(s) of the local bipolar electrogram, recorded from the ablation and adjacent electrode immediately prior to the application of radiofrequency current, correlated with precision in localization adequate to permit AP ablation. Signal analysis was performed for 326 sets of electrograms preceding the attempted ablation of 107 APs in 100 consecutive patients. For 80 antegrade APs, the following variables were evaluated: (1) the presence or absence of an AP potential; (2) the local atrial-AP interval; (3) the local atrioventricular (AV) interval; and (4) the relationship between the onset of local ventricular depolarization and onset of delta wave of the surface electrocardiogram. For the 27 concealed APs, the following characteristics were evaluated: (1) the presence or absence of an AP potential; and (2) the local VA interval during reciprocating tachycardia or ventricular pacing.

RESULTS

Antegrade APs: By statistical analysis, the best correlate of successful ablation of an antegrade AP was a local AV interval less than or equal to 40 msec (positive predictive value = 94%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 81%-100%). Local AV intervals less than or equal to 50 msec preceded 88% of successful AP ablations, compared to only 8% of failed radiofrequency current applications. The positive predictive value of the other variables were: presence of an AP potential: 35% (95% CI = 27%-40%); local atrial-AP intervals less than or equal to 40 msec: 54% (95% CI = 43%-66%); and local ventricular depolarization preceding onset of the delta wave 43% (95% CI = 34%-52%). For concealed APs, the positive predictive value of a VA interval less than 60 msec was 71% (95% CI = 48%-88%); the positive predictive value for the presence of an AP potential was 58% (95% CI = 32%-81%).

CONCLUSIONS

No single electrogram characteristic had a positive predictive value and a sensitivity greater than 90% for AP localization adequate for radiofrequency current ablation. For antegrade APs, the best correlate of adequate localization was a local AV interval less than or equal to 40 msec; as a corollary, radiofrequency current applications at sites where the local AV was greater than 60 msec, were unlikely to be effective. Objective criteria for the localization of concealed APs were less certain. Electrogram analysis, as a guide to AP localization and ablation, requires careful analysis of multiple variables, with analysis of the local AV interval a salient objective factor.