Hopfer U, Sigrist-Nelson K, Ammann E, Murer H
J Cell Physiol. 1976 Dec;89(4):805-10. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040890447.
A comparison of L-valine and D-glucose transport was carried out with vesicles of plasma membrane isolated either from the luminal (brush border) or from the contra-luminal (basolateral) region of small intestinal epithelial cells. The existence of transport systems for both non-electrolytes was demonstrated by stereospecificity and saturability of uptake, as well as tracer coupling. Transport of L-valine and D-glucose differs markedly in the two types of plasma membrane with respect to stimulation by Na+. The presence of Na+ stimulated initial L-valine and D-glucose uptake in brush border, but not in basolateral membrane. Moreover, an electro-chemical Na+ gradient, oriented with the lower potential on the inside, supported accumulation of the non-electrolytes above medium concentration only in the brush border membrane. L-Valine and D-glucose transport also were saturated at lower concentrations in brush border (10-20 mM) than in basolateral plasma membranes (30-50 mM). A third difference between the two membranes was found in the effectiveness of known inhibitors of D-glucose transport. In brush border membranes phlorizin was more potent than phloretin and 2', 3', 4'-trihydroxy-4-methoxy chalcone and cytochalasin B did not inhibit at all. In contrast, with the basolateral plasma membranes the order of potency was changed to phloretin = 2',3',4'-trihydroxy-4-methoxy chalcone greater than cytochalasin B greater than phlorizin. These results indicate the presence of different types of transport systems for monosaccharides and neutral amino acids in the luminal and contra-luminal region of the plasma membrane. Active transepithelial transport can be explained on the basis of the different properties of the non-electrolyte transport systems in the two cellular regions and an electro-chemical Na+ gradient that is dependent on cellular metabolism.
利用从小肠上皮细胞的管腔面(刷状缘)或对腔面(基底外侧)分离的质膜囊泡,对L-缬氨酸和D-葡萄糖的转运进行了比较。通过摄取的立体特异性、饱和性以及示踪剂偶联,证实了两种非电解质转运系统的存在。L-缬氨酸和D-葡萄糖的转运在两种质膜类型中,关于Na⁺刺激存在显著差异。Na⁺的存在刺激了刷状缘中L-缬氨酸和D-葡萄糖的初始摄取,但在基底外侧膜中则不然。此外,电化学Na⁺梯度(内侧电位较低)仅在刷状缘膜中支持非电解质在高于培养基浓度时的积累。L-缬氨酸和D-葡萄糖的转运在刷状缘(10 - 20 mM)比在基底外侧质膜(30 - 50 mM)中在更低浓度时就达到饱和。在两种膜之间发现的第三个差异在于已知的D-葡萄糖转运抑制剂的有效性。在刷状缘膜中,根皮苷比根皮素和2',3',4'-三羟基-4-甲氧基查耳酮更有效,而细胞松弛素B根本没有抑制作用。相反,对于基底外侧质膜,效力顺序变为根皮素 = 2',3',4'-三羟基-4-甲氧基查耳酮大于细胞松弛素B大于根皮苷。这些结果表明,在质膜的管腔面和对腔面区域存在不同类型的单糖和中性氨基酸转运系统。主动跨上皮转运可以基于两个细胞区域中非电解质转运系统的不同特性以及依赖于细胞代谢的电化学Na⁺梯度来解释。