• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发共享决策项目以提高医疗保健质量。

Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care.

作者信息

Kasper J F, Mulley A G, Wennberg J E

机构信息

Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755.

出版信息

QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jun;18(6):183-90. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30531-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30531-0
PMID:1379705
Abstract

We strongly believe in the importance of patient involvement in a medical decision. The interactive SDPs appear to be an effective way to facilitate this involvement. One key to the acceptance of these programs by patients and physicians is that they be--and be perceived as--fair, accurate, and balanced. Herein we have described the well-defined protocol for developing, evaluating, and updating SDPs. The first of the foundation's programs dealing with benign prostatic hyperplasia has been well received by patients and clinicians and has been demonstrated to have an impact on practice patterns. Efforts are under way to evaluate four additional programs, leading to widespread availability of the first five SDPs by fall of 1992.

摘要

我们坚信患者参与医疗决策的重要性。交互式共享决策程序似乎是促进这种参与的有效方式。患者和医生接受这些程序的一个关键在于它们要——并且被视为——公平、准确且平衡。在此我们描述了开发、评估和更新共享决策程序的明确方案。该基金会首个针对良性前列腺增生的程序已受到患者和临床医生的广泛欢迎,并已证明对实践模式产生了影响。目前正在努力评估另外四个程序,以便在1992年秋季前广泛提供前五个共享决策程序。

相似文献

1
Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care.开发共享决策项目以提高医疗保健质量。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jun;18(6):183-90. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30531-0.
2
Responding to the challenge. A status report on shared decision-making programs.应对挑战。关于共同决策项目的现状报告。
HMO Pract. 1993 Dec;7(4):176-81.
3
Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia.患者对一项旨在促进患者参与良性前列腺增生治疗决策的项目的反应。
Med Care. 1995 Aug;33(8):771-82. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00003.
4
Interactive video assists in clinical decision making.
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Jun;37(2):201-5.
5
The development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid based on decision analysis for two treatment conditions: benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension.基于决策分析针对两种治疗情况(良性前列腺增生和高血压)的决策辅助工具的开发与初步评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Feb;52(2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00091-0.
6
The future of patient input into medical decision making.
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jun;18(6):182. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30534-6.
7
The Complementary Medicine Education and Outcomes (CAMEO) program: a foundation for patient and health professional education and decision support programs.补充医学教育和成果(CAMEO)计划:患者和健康专业人员教育及决策支持计划的基础。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Dec;89(3):461-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
8
Impact of a shared decision-making program on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.共同决策项目对良性前列腺增生患者的影响。
Urology. 1999 May;53(5):913-20. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00051-5.
9
Development and field testing of a consumer shared decision-making training program for adults with low literacy.针对低识字水平成年人的消费者共同决策培训项目的开发与现场测试。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
A consumer guide for marketing medical services: one institution's experience.一份医疗服务营销的消费者指南:一个机构的经验
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 May;18(5):164-71. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30527-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian learning-based agent negotiation model to support doctor-patient shared decision making.基于贝叶斯学习的智能体协商模型以支持医患共同决策。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02839-y.
2
Barriers to and Facilitators of Participation in Weight Loss Intervention for Patients with Suboptimal Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: A Qualitative Study among Patients, Physicians, and Therapists.肥胖症手术后体重减轻不理想的患者参与减肥干预的障碍和促进因素:一项对患者、医生和治疗师的定性研究。
Obes Facts. 2022;15(5):674-684. doi: 10.1159/000526259. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
3
The Feasibility and Utility of a Personal Health Record for Persons With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers for Web-Based Care Coordination: Mixed Methods Study.
个人健康记录对痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者进行基于网络的护理协调的可行性和效用:混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2020 Jun 26;3(1):e17769. doi: 10.2196/17769.
4
Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure.患者决策辅助工具:基于决策树结构的内容分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 19;19(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0840-x.
5
A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种用于孕期抗抑郁药使用的患者决策辅助工具:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Feb 29;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1233-4.
6
Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age.高龄孕产妇产前检查决策辅助工具的开发与评估
J Genet Couns. 1999 Aug;8(4):217-33. doi: 10.1023/A:1022998415890.
7
Informed shared decision making: An exploratory study in pharmacy.知情共同决策:药学领域的一项探索性研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2008 Apr;6(2):57-67. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552008000200001. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
8
A systematic development process for patient decision aids.患者决策辅助工具的系统开发流程。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
The era of "e": the use of new technologies in advance care planning.“e”时代:新技术在预先护理计划中的应用。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):376-383.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.08.005.
10
Pharmacogenetics of smoking cessation in general practice: results from the patch II and patch in practice trials.一般实践中戒烟的药物遗传学:贴片 II 及贴片实践试验的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Mar;13(3):157-67. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq246. Epub 2011 Jan 25.