Noël P, Solberg L A
Division of Hematology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1992;12(3):193-215. doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(92)90054-t.
Our understanding of the biology of leukemia and myelodysplasia is still only partial. The diagnosis of myelodysplasia is often based on quantitative and qualitative findings in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. These findings are often shared by other disorders. There is a need for sensitive and inexpensive laboratory tests to determine clonality and karyotypic abnormalities in this disorder. Future classifications of these syndromes will need to be based on morphologic and biologic markers that are closely linked to disease progression, response to treatment, and survival. Our limited understanding of the pathogenesis of MDS decreases the specificity and effectiveness of our therapeutic interventions. Agents that are minimally toxic such as CRA, danazol, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, androgens, and pyridoxine are seldom useful. Antileukemic therapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation have a major role to play in patients younger than 45 years of age; in older patients these treatment modalities remain controversial because of their toxicity. Hematopoietic growth factors, used alone or in combination, may improve the quality of life and improve survival of patients with MDS. Growth factors may also decrease treatment-related mortality associated with chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation and render these treatment modalities available for a higher percentage of patients. The development of more specific differentiating agents may permit hematopoietic differentiation while minimizing side effects.
