Fallon W F, Wears R L
Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health Science Center/Jacksonville 32209.
J Trauma. 1992 Jul;33(1):110-6; discussion 116-7.
Since 1977, six clinical trials have been performed on the subject of routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients requiring tube thoracostomy for trauma. No definitive conclusions have been reached regarding the efficacy of antibiotic use in this setting. The results of these clinical trials were pooled to generate an unbiased estimate of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for tube thoracostomy using the technique of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is a statistical method for synthesizing results from separate but similar experiments, grouping them, and comparing each to the null hypothesis. Meta-analysis allows synthesis of all of the available data on antibiotic prophylaxis for tube thoracostomy to resolve the controversy surrounding this issue generated by different but similar clinical studies with conflicting results. Despite different conclusions of value when taken individually, the combined analysis does not support the null hypothesis (no effect of antibiotics). The statistical method is highly significant despite different mechanisms of injury, pathologic findings, and antibiotics employed.
自1977年以来,针对因创伤需要进行胸腔闭式引流术的患者进行常规抗生素预防这一主题,已开展了六项临床试验。对于在此情况下使用抗生素的疗效尚未得出明确结论。采用荟萃分析技术对这些临床试验结果进行汇总,以得出关于胸腔闭式引流术抗生素预防疗效的无偏估计。荟萃分析是一种统计方法,用于综合来自单独但相似实验的结果,对其进行分组,并将每组结果与零假设进行比较。荟萃分析能够综合所有关于胸腔闭式引流术抗生素预防的可用数据,以解决不同但相似的临床研究结果相互冲突所引发的围绕该问题的争议。尽管单独来看各研究的价值结论不同,但综合分析并不支持零假设(抗生素无作用)。尽管损伤机制、病理发现和使用的抗生素不同,但该统计方法具有高度显著性。