Kerby R E, McGlumphy E A, Holloway J A
College of Dentistry, Ohio State University.
Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Jul-Aug;5(4):321-5.
The dislodging force, the compressive strength at 24 hours, and the film thickness of four resin composite luting cements (UDA, UDA with fluoride, Panavia OP, and DenMat) and a conventional glass-ionomer cement (Shofu Type I) were compared. The axial force necessary to dislodge each cemented 0 degree abutment from an internally threaded Steri-Oss implant (n = 5) was then determined using a mechanical testing machine. UDA with fluoride appears to be a significantly stronger luting agent for abutment cementation than is either UDA or DenMat (P less than .05). DenMat resin composite cement exhibited the highest mean compressive strength whereas Panavia OP had the lowest value for film thickness.
比较了四种树脂复合树脂粘结水门汀（UDA、含氟UDA、Panavia OP和DenMat）和一种传统玻璃离子水门汀（Shofu I型）的脱位力、24小时抗压强度和薄膜厚度。然后使用机械试验机确定将每个粘结的0度基台从内螺纹Steri-Oss种植体上脱位所需的轴向力（n = 5）。含氟UDA似乎是一种比UDA或DenMat显著更强的用于基台粘结的粘结剂（P小于0.05）。DenMat树脂复合水门汀表现出最高的平均抗压强度，而Panavia OP的薄膜厚度值最低。
