Suppr超能文献

使用多普勒导管测量冠状动脉血流量:在动物模型中的验证

Measurement of volumetric coronary blood flow with a Doppler catheter: validation in an animal model.

作者信息

Sudhir K, Hargrave V K, Johnson E L, Aldea G, Mori H, Ports T A, Yock P G

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1992 Oct;124(4):870-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90966-y.

Abstract

Although Doppler catheter recordings are used to determine coronary flow velocity, their accuracy in the estimation of volumetric blood flow has not been validated. To address this issue, Doppler-derived coronary flow was measured in a canine model and compared with that obtained by means of an electromagnetic flowmeter. A carotid artery-to-circumflex coronary artery shunt was created in six dogs with tubing that incorporated an inline electromagnetic flow device. The circumflex artery was occlusively cannulated by means of a rigid metal stent of known internal diameter, which was placed 2 cm into the vessel, and flow was measured in the stent region by means of a 3F Doppler catheter. Analysis of Doppler shift signals was performed by means of a zero-crossing detector (ZCD) and an off-line fast-Fourier transformation (FFT) system. Flow derived from peak FFT velocities corresponded closely to electromagnetic flow (slope 1.09, r = 0.93), whereas mean FFT and ZCD velocities underestimated electromagnetic flow (with slopes of 0.47 and 0.46, respectively) despite a close correlation (r = 0.92, 0.94). Thus FFT analysis of the Doppler signal with determination of peak velocity gives the most accurate representation of flow, whereas measurements based on ZCD mean velocities may significantly underestimate coronary flow.

摘要

尽管多普勒导管记录用于确定冠状动脉血流速度,但其在估计容积血流量方面的准确性尚未得到验证。为了解决这个问题,在犬类模型中测量了多普勒衍生的冠状动脉血流,并与通过电磁流量计获得的血流进行了比较。使用包含在线电磁流量装置的管道,在六只狗身上建立了颈动脉至旋支冠状动脉分流。旋支动脉通过已知内径的刚性金属支架进行闭塞插管,该支架放置在血管内2厘米处,并通过3F多普勒导管在支架区域测量血流。通过过零检测器(ZCD)和离线快速傅里叶变换(FFT)系统对多普勒频移信号进行分析。从FFT峰值速度得出的血流与电磁血流密切相关(斜率为1.09,r = 0.93),而尽管相关性密切(r = 0.92,0.94),但平均FFT和ZCD速度低估了电磁血流(斜率分别为0.47和0.46)。因此,通过确定峰值速度对多普勒信号进行FFT分析能最准确地反映血流,而基于ZCD平均速度的测量可能会显著低估冠状动脉血流。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验