Watanabe K, Nakadomo F, Miyake M, Tanaka K, Maeda K
Osaka Prefectural College of Nursing.
Ann Physiol Anthropol. 1992 Jul;11(4):409-16. doi: 10.2114/ahs1983.11.409.
Although underwater weighing has been regarded as a representative of the criterion reference methods for determining body composition, this technique is cumbersome for screening. The purpose of the present study was to examine the stability of body composition assessed not only by underwater weighting but also by existing bioelectrical impedance equations and skinfold thickness equations during a 4-week period. Ten male and 10 female junior high school pupils, aged 12 to 15 years, volunteered to serve as subjects. Body density (Db) was estimated by underwater weighing (UW), skinfold thickness (ST) method, and bioelectrical impedance (BI) method. The UW was considered criterion reference method. The underwater weight was the heaviest value that was reproduced twice at least among 5 to 10 measurements. Residual lung volume was estimated "in water," with the subject in the sitting position, by a closed-circuit helium-dilution method. The ST equations used for determination of Db were those developed by Nagamine et al., while in the BI method equations proposed by Nakadomo et al. were applied. The Db for boys by UW did not differ significantly during the 4-week period; however, in girls it was significantly lower in the 2nd test (1.0479 +/- 0.018 g/ml) than in the 1st test (1.0500 +/- 0.019 g/ml). Likewise, the Db estimated by ST and BI methods remained unchanged in boys, while in girls it was significantly lower in the 2nd test (BI: 1.0445 +/- 0.010 vs. 1.0389 +/- 0.013 g/ml). Test-retest reliability of all the three methods for measurements conducted 4 weeks apart were statistically significant (e.g. UW: r = 0.99, ST: r = 0.94, BI: r = 0.89 in girls). In conclusion, the validity of Db estimated by these two methods was found to be insufficient when absolute values are required. However, body composition estimates assessed by ST and BI methods for boys and girls may be stable on a relative basis.
尽管水下称重法一直被视为测定身体成分的标准参考方法之一,但该技术用于筛查时较为繁琐。本研究的目的是检验在4周时间内,不仅通过水下称重法,还通过现有的生物电阻抗方程和皮褶厚度方程评估的身体成分的稳定性。10名年龄在12至15岁的初中男生和10名初中女生自愿作为研究对象。通过水下称重法(UW)、皮褶厚度(ST)法和生物电阻抗(BI)法估算身体密度(Db)。水下称重法被视为标准参考方法。水下重量是在5至10次测量中至少重复出现两次的最重值。通过闭路氦稀释法,让受试者坐姿在水中估算残气量。用于测定Db的ST方程是由永胺等人开发的,而在BI法中应用的是中友等人提出的方程。UW法测得的男孩的Db在4周内无显著差异;然而,女孩在第二次测试中的Db(1.0479±0.018克/毫升)显著低于第一次测试(1.0500±0.019克/毫升)。同样,ST法和BI法估算的男孩的Db保持不变,而女孩在第二次测试中的Db显著降低(BI法:1.0445±0.010与1.0389±0.013克/毫升)。间隔4周进行的所有三种测量方法的重测信度均具有统计学意义(例如女孩中UW法:r = 0.99,ST法:r = 0.94,BI法:r = 0.89)。总之,当需要绝对值时,发现这两种方法估算的Db的有效性不足。然而,ST法和BI法评估的男孩和女孩的身体成分估计值在相对基础上可能是稳定的。