Gold R S, Skinner M J
Faculty of Education, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
AIDS. 1992 Sep;6(9):1021-30. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199209000-00017.
To investigate (1) the types of justifications, if any, that young gay men give themselves at the time they make the decision to have unprotected anal intercourse and (2) the types of occasion on which they are most at risk of having unprotected intercourse.
In structured interviews, gay men aged 15-21 years were asked to recall two sexual encounters from the preceding 6 months: one in which they had had unprotected anal intercourse ('unsafe' encounter) and one in which they had resisted a strong temptation to have unprotected intercourse ('safe' encounter). We studied both types of encounter to enable identification of situational variables distinguishing between them.
The first two factors that emerged from a Factor Analysis of the self-justification data ('unsafe' encounter, n = 219) involved, respectively, high-risk behaviour in response to a negative mood state and inferring from perceptible characteristics that the partner was unlikely to be infected. The most commonly reported self-justification was of this latter type. In respondents recalling both encounters (n = 115), sexual desires, mood, communication, and use of 'dirty talk' distinguished between the encounters. In contrast, type of partner, consumption of alcohol or drugs, desire for excitement, and use of pornography did not.
Results are discussed in relation to those obtained in our earlier study of older gay men. Young gay men appear to be more single-minded about what they want to do sexually, and more likely to infer from perceptible characteristics that their partner is unlikely to be infected. In young gay men, a negative mood state is associated with unsafe sex, an opposite finding to that obtained with older gay men. The results also suggest the possible importance of failure to communicate about desires concerning safe sex and the use of 'dirty talk'; these may help to facilitate the occurrence of unsafe sex.
调查(1)年轻男同性恋者在决定进行无保护肛交时给自己的理由类型(若有),以及(2)他们进行无保护性行为风险最高的场合类型。
在结构化访谈中,要求15至21岁的男同性恋者回忆前6个月内的两次性接触:一次是他们进行了无保护肛交(“不安全”接触),另一次是他们抵制了进行无保护性行为的强烈诱惑(“安全”接触)。我们研究这两种接触类型,以便识别区分它们的情境变量。
对自我辩解数据(“不安全”接触,n = 219)进行因子分析得出的前两个因素分别涉及因负面情绪状态而产生的高风险行为,以及从可察觉特征推断伴侣不太可能被感染。最常报告的自我辩解是后一种类型。在回忆了两次接触的受访者(n = 115)中,性欲、情绪、沟通和使用“低俗言语”在两次接触之间存在差异。相比之下,伴侣类型、饮酒或吸毒、寻求刺激的欲望以及使用色情制品则没有差异。
结合我们早期对年长男同性恋者的研究结果对本研究结果进行了讨论。年轻男同性恋者在性方面似乎更专注于自己想做的事情,并且更有可能从可察觉特征推断其伴侣不太可能被感染。在年轻男同性恋者中,负面情绪状态与不安全的性行为相关,这一发现与年长男同性恋者的情况相反。结果还表明,未能就安全性行为的欲望进行沟通以及使用“低俗言语”可能具有重要影响;这些可能有助于促成不安全性行为的发生。