Burgess J O, Haveman C W, Butzin C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Am J Dent. 1992 Jun;5(3):137-9.
An in vivo study of two resin materials (Barricaid and Caulk Temporary Crown and Bridge Resin) was done to determine the retention, post-operative sensitivity, and fabrication time of provisional restorations made from these materials. Following the placement of these resins in 67 intracoronal cavity preparations of 19 adult patients, a baseline evaluation was made which included a clinical examination and color slides. Twenty-four hours after the temporary restorations were placed, the patients completed evaluations of the post-operative sensitivity experienced. There was no difference in post-operative sensitivity between the teeth restored with Barricaid or Caulk Temporary Crown and Bridge Resin. At the insertion appointment of the final restoration, the interim restoration's success rate was determined. There was no difference between the retention of the two provisional materials. Fabrication time was significantly different with Barricaid restorations requiring less than one-half the fabrication time of the Caulk Temporary Crown and Bridge Resin material.
对两种树脂材料（Barricaid和Caulk临时冠桥树脂）进行了一项体内研究，以确定用这些材料制作的临时修复体的固位力、术后敏感性和制作时间。在19名成年患者的67个冠内洞型制备中放置这些树脂后，进行了包括临床检查和彩色幻灯片在内的基线评估。临时修复体放置24小时后，患者完成了对术后敏感性的评估。用Barricaid或Caulk临时冠桥树脂修复的牙齿在术后敏感性方面没有差异。在最终修复体就位时，确定了临时修复体的成功率。两种临时材料的固位力没有差异。Barricaid修复体的制作时间明显不同，所需时间不到Caulk临时冠桥树脂材料制作时间的一半。
