• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洗必泰漱口液与木质牙间隙清洁器在减轻牙间隙牙龈炎方面的比较。

Comparison of a chlorhexidine rinse and a wooden interdental cleaner in reducing interdental gingivitis.

作者信息

Bouwsma O J, Yost K G, Baron H J

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc., Skillman, NJ.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1992 Jun;5(3):143-6.

PMID:1388952
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an antimicrobial rinse (chlorhexidine) compared to a positive control of mechanical oral hygiene in reducing interdental gingival inflammation. The mechanical group showed a significantly greater reduction in interdental gingivitis as determined by bleeding compared to the chemical rinse. Even though the chemical rinse has been shown to be effective in reducing inflammation on the visible buccal and lingual gingival surfaces, it is significantly less effective than the mechanical device in reducing bleeding in the interdental area.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估抗菌漱口水(洗必泰)与机械口腔卫生阳性对照相比,在减少牙间牙龈炎症方面的有效性。与化学漱口水相比,机械组在通过出血判定的牙间牙龈炎减少方面显示出显著更大的效果。尽管化学漱口水已被证明在减少可见的颊侧和舌侧牙龈表面炎症方面有效,但在减少牙间区域出血方面,其效果明显不如机械装置。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a chlorhexidine rinse and a wooden interdental cleaner in reducing interdental gingivitis.洗必泰漱口液与木质牙间隙清洁器在减轻牙间隙牙龈炎方面的比较。
Am J Dent. 1992 Jun;5(3):143-6.
2
Mechanical devices versus antimicrobial rinses in plaque and gingivitis reduction.机械装置与抗菌漱口水在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较
Clin Prev Dent. 1990 Aug-Sep;12(3):8-11.
3
Comparison between mechanical cleaning and an antimicrobial rinse for the treatment and prevention of interdental gingivitis.机械清洁与抗菌冲洗治疗和预防牙间龈炎的比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Mar;20(3):172-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00340.x.
4
Comparative efficacy of the standard flossing procedure and a new floss applicator in reducing interproximal bleeding: a short-term study.标准牙线清洁方法与新型牙线棒在减少牙间隙出血方面的疗效比较:一项短期研究。
J Periodontol. 1992 Sep;63(9):757-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.9.757.
5
The addition of a water flosser to power tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and plaque.在电动牙刷的基础上增加水牙线:对出血、牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(2):57-63.
6
Comparison of a phenolic and a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on the development of plaque and gingivitis.酚类漱口水与0.2%洗必泰漱口水对牙菌斑形成及牙龈炎影响的比较
Clin Prev Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug;13(4):31-5.
7
Effectiveness of a sanguinarine regimen after scaling and root planing.刮治术和根面平整术后血根碱治疗方案的有效性
J Periodontol. 1999 Mar;70(3):307-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.3.307.
8
Plaque and gingivitis in the elderly: a randomized, single-blind clinical trial on the outcome of intensified mechanical or antibacterial oral hygiene measures.老年人的牙菌斑与牙龈炎:一项关于强化机械性或抗菌性口腔卫生措施效果的随机单盲临床试验
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Dec;34(12):1068-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01150.x.
9
Comparison of the use of different modes of mechanical oral hygiene in prevention of plaque and gingivitis.不同机械口腔卫生模式在预防牙菌斑和牙龈炎中的应用比较。
J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1386-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070654.
10
Interproximal gingivitis and plaque reduction by four interdental products.四种牙间清洁产品对邻面牙龈炎和牙菌斑的减少作用
J Clin Dent. 2006;17(3):79-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.洗必泰漱口水作为牙龈健康的辅助治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31;3(3):CD008676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008676.pub2.