Leelawat C, Scherer W, Chang J, Schulman A, Vijayaraghavan T
New York University College of Dentistry.
J Esthet Dent. 1992 Mar-Apr;4(2):41-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00657.x.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine whether adhesive lining materials reduce microleakage in amalgam restorations, and to observe the degree of microleakage at the interface between freshly placed (new) and existing (old) amalgam. Forty-eight specimens were used in the experimental groups. The materials used to study microleakage in this investigation were: copal varnish, a dentin bonding agent (Clearfil New Bond), and a 4-META adhesive (Amalgambond). No significant difference in microleakage was found at the interfaces between freshly placed and existing amalgam. Significantly less microleakage was noted in specimens using the 4-META adhesive and the dentin bonding agent as compared to specimens in which no lining material was placed. Significantly less microleakage was noted in specimens using the 4-META adhesive compared to specimens using cavity varnish.
本体外研究的目的是确定粘结衬层材料是否能减少银汞合金修复体中的微渗漏,并观察新放置(新鲜)和已存在(陈旧)银汞合金界面处的微渗漏程度。实验组使用了48个标本。本研究中用于研究微渗漏的材料有:珂罗酊清漆、一种牙本质粘结剂(Clearfil New Bond)和一种4-META粘结剂(Amalgambond)。新鲜放置和已存在的银汞合金界面处的微渗漏没有显著差异。与未放置衬层材料的标本相比,使用4-META粘结剂和牙本质粘结剂的标本中微渗漏明显更少。与使用窝洞封闭剂的标本相比,使用4-META粘结剂的标本中微渗漏明显更少。