Chan K C
University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Iowa City.
J Esthet Dent. 1992 Jul-Aug;4(4):114-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00676.x.
This study investigated the microleakage between glass-ionomer cement and Silux or Herculite with and without Scotchbond 2. Cavities were prepared in polymerized composite resin samples and "restored" with a glass ionomer cement with and without Scotchbond 2. The samples were thermocycled and immersed in 0.05% crystal violet solution for 2 hours, then embedded in clear casting resin, sectioned, and examined with an optical microscope. The results indicated that a high degree of dye penetration was found in samples of GC and Silux, and GC and Herculite without Scotchbond 2. The use of Scotchbond 2 significantly reduced the degree of dye penetration, but did not completely eliminate dye penetration.
本研究调查了在使用和不使用Scotchbond 2的情况下,玻璃离子水门汀与Silux或Herculite之间的微渗漏情况。在聚合复合树脂样本中制备窝洞,并用使用和不使用Scotchbond 2的玻璃离子水门汀进行“修复”。样本经过热循环处理,然后浸入0.05%的结晶紫溶液中2小时,接着嵌入透明浇铸树脂中,切片,并通过光学显微镜进行检查。结果表明,在未使用Scotchbond 2的GC和Silux样本以及GC和Herculite样本中发现了高度的染料渗透。使用Scotchbond 2显著降低了染料渗透程度,但并未完全消除染料渗透。