Pollock J S, Ferguson D M, Mackenzie N M
Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow.
Br Dent J. 1992 Oct 10;173(6):207-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808003.
General anaesthesia was assessed in 100 dental patients in general dental practice using either propofol or methohexitone. Mean induction doses were 1.7 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg for propofol and methohexitone, respectively. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and oxygen, supplemented in the majority of cases with halothane. Both groups were comparable in relation to satisfactory surgical conditions and recovery. The maximum heart rate following induction of anaesthesia was significantly greater in the group given methohexitone. Despite the satisfactory results obtained in this study the need for full resuscitation facilities will encourage the trend towards most dental general anaesthesia taking place in a hospital environment.
在普通牙科诊所，对100名牙科患者使用丙泊酚或美索比妥进行全身麻醉评估。丙泊酚和美索比妥的平均诱导剂量分别为1.7mg/kg和1.5mg/kg。使用氧化亚氮和氧气维持麻醉，大多数病例补充氟烷。两组在手术条件和恢复情况方面相当。接受美索比妥的组在麻醉诱导后最高心率明显更高。尽管本研究取得了令人满意的结果，但由于需要完善的复苏设备，这将促使大多数牙科全身麻醉倾向于在医院环境中进行。
