Jordaens L, Caenepeel A, Calle P
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.
Clin Cardiol. 1992 Sep;15(9):693-5. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960150913.
Atrial fibrillation with fast ventricular response remains a matter of concern in patients treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). A patient with dilated cardiomyopathy, suffering from atrial arrhythmias and recurrent cardiac arrest due to both ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, is presented. Ablation of the AV node by means of low-energy direct-current shocks with subsequent pacemaker implantation was performed before ICD implantation. The patient received shocks after four months, when he had recurrence of AV conduction with a slow ventricular rate. Pacemaker interaction was excluded, and no short ventricular arrhythmias were observed. During electrophysiologic study after electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation, persistent second degree heart block was documented, giving further evidence that atrial arrhythmias were not responsible for the shocks. The patient's functional status remains good after more than 18 months of follow-up.
对于接受植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗的患者,快速心室反应的心房颤动仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。本文介绍了一名患有扩张型心肌病的患者,该患者因室性心动过速和心室颤动而患有房性心律失常和反复心脏骤停。在植入ICD之前,通过低能量直流电电击消融房室结并随后植入起搏器。患者在四个月后接受了电击,当时他出现了房室传导复发且心室率缓慢。排除了起搏器相互作用,未观察到短阵室性心律失常。在心房颤动电复律后的电生理研究中,记录到持续性二度房室传导阻滞,进一步证明房性心律失常不是电击的原因。经过超过18个月的随访,患者的功能状态仍然良好。