SMADEL J E
Science. 1963 Apr 12;140(3563):153-60. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3563.153.
The evidence summarized in this article is sufficient to support conclusions as follows. 1) Antibiotics penetrate rapidly into mammalian cells and inhibit multiplication of susceptible microbes within the cell as promptly and effectively as they inhibit multiplication of such microbes outside the cell. This is consistent with clinical experience. 2) Death of individual organisms inside mammalian cells bathed in medium containing antibiotics continues over several weeks but may not proceed pari passu with time. This observation supports the as yet meager clinical data, which suggest that eradication of the typhoid carrier state may be accomplished through antibiotic therapy, provided (i) the proper antibiotic is selected; (ii) it is administered in amounts sufficient to obtain continuous suppression of growth of intracellular organisms; and (iii) the regimen is maintained for 2 or 3 weeks. 3) The actual cause of death and destruction of intracellular microbes in treated cells remains an enigma. To attribute this to inanition or senescence of the organisms, without describing mechanisms, is to avoid the issue. The hypotheses dealing with inactivation of intracellular microbes by intracellular antimicrobial substances and antibodies deserve to be explored. 4) Evidence from the ward and laboratory suggests that infected cells can clear themselves of invading pathogens and recover. Although antibiotics have played the major role in demonstrating this in the laboratory, it is possible that they do nothing more than hold the intruders in abeyance while natural defense mechanisms of the cell gain the upper hand. Certainly such cellular mechanisms must provide a potent force for survival; otherwise, why would 98 percent of typhoid patients fail to become chronic carriers? 5) The continued study of infections, including the carrier state, with a view to understanding the abnormalities created by the multiplying intracellular microbe and the means by which the cell corrects these and eliminates the intruder, should open new vistas in chemotherapy and immunology.
本文总结的证据足以支持以下结论。1)抗生素能迅速穿透哺乳动物细胞,并像在细胞外抑制敏感微生物繁殖一样迅速有效地抑制细胞内此类微生物的繁殖。这与临床经验相符。2)在含有抗生素的培养基中培养的哺乳动物细胞内,个体微生物的死亡会持续数周,但可能不会随时间同步进行。这一观察结果支持了目前尚不充分的临床数据,这些数据表明,根除伤寒带菌状态或许可通过抗生素治疗实现,条件是:(i)选择合适的抗生素;(ii)给予足够的剂量以持续抑制细胞内微生物的生长;(iii)治疗方案维持2至3周。3)经处理的细胞内微生物死亡和破坏的实际原因仍是个谜。将此归因于微生物的营养缺乏或衰老而不描述其机制,是在回避问题。关于细胞内抗菌物质和抗体使细胞内微生物失活的假说值得探讨。4)病房和实验室的证据表明,受感染的细胞能够清除入侵的病原体并恢复。尽管抗生素在实验室证明这一点上起了主要作用,但它们可能只不过是在细胞的自然防御机制占上风时,暂时抑制入侵者。当然,这种细胞机制必定提供了强大的生存力量;否则,为什么98%的伤寒患者不会成为慢性带菌者呢?5)持续研究包括带菌状态在内的感染,以了解细胞内微生物繁殖所造成的异常情况,以及细胞纠正这些异常并清除入侵者的方式,应该会为化疗和免疫学开辟新的前景。