Wong K H, Maezawa H, Urano M
University of Kentucky Medical Center, Department of Radiation Medicine, Lexington 40536-0084.
Int J Hyperthermia. 1992 Sep-Oct;8(5):645-58. doi: 10.3109/02656739209038000.
Tumour control by local hyperthermia (43.5 degrees C, 30 min) and radiation (20 Gy) given in combination with misonidazole (MISO) or metronidazole (METRO) was studied using FSa-II murine fibrosarcoma. When MISO or METRO (5 mmol/kg) was given 30 min before heat and subsequently treated with radiation, tumour regression was observed for both agents. Radiation dose-response curves for MISO and METRO with heating at 43.5 degrees C for 30 min were identical. Mouse foot reaction was used to evaluate local toxicity following combined heat, a nitroimidazole and radiation treatment. MISO enhanced the magnitude of foot reaction and prolonged the recovery time compared with heat plus radiation controls. There were no observable differences of foot reaction between animals treated with heat plus radiation and those animals treated with heat, radiation and METRO. Pharmacokinetics of the nitroimidazoles heated at 43.5 degrees C for 30 min in FSa-II tumours were investigated as a possible mechanism of thermal sensitization. Local hyperthermia did not alter the pharmacokinetics of METRO. Tumour concentration and tumour/plasma ratio of MISO were slightly decreased during heating. Since the hypoxic metabolism of the nitroimidazoles did not increase significantly during the heat treatment, the thermal enhancement of MISO or METRO radiosensitization cannot be explained by the increase in hypoxic cytotoxicity of the nitroimidazoles at elevated temperature alone. The two nitroimidazoles also were not accumulated in the tumour after heating. Therefore, alternation of pharmacokinetics is not the major mechanism for the thermal enhancement of nitroimidazole radiosensitization. The METRO radiosensitization effect became identical to that of MISO at elevated temperatures is of particular importance in clinical radiosensitization. The very low local and systemic toxicity together with the high efficacy of METRO at elevated temperatures will make it an attractive candidate as a future clinical radiosensitizer.
使用FSa-II小鼠纤维肉瘤研究了局部热疗(43.5摄氏度,30分钟)与放射治疗(20 Gy)联合米索硝唑(MISO)或甲硝唑(METRO)对肿瘤的控制作用。当在热疗前30分钟给予MISO或METRO(5 mmol/kg)并随后进行放射治疗时,观察到两种药物均能使肿瘤消退。在43.5摄氏度加热30分钟的情况下,MISO和METRO的放射剂量反应曲线相同。采用小鼠足部反应来评估热疗、硝基咪唑类药物与放射治疗联合后的局部毒性。与热疗加放射治疗对照组相比,MISO增强了足部反应的程度并延长了恢复时间。热疗加放射治疗组动物与热疗、放射治疗加METRO组动物之间的足部反应没有明显差异。研究了在FSa-II肿瘤中于43.5摄氏度加热30分钟时硝基咪唑类药物的药代动力学,以此作为热增敏的一种可能机制。局部热疗并未改变METRO的药代动力学。加热过程中,MISO的肿瘤浓度和肿瘤/血浆比值略有下降。由于在热处理过程中硝基咪唑类药物的低氧代谢没有显著增加,因此MISO或METRO放射增敏的热增强作用不能仅通过高温下硝基咪唑类药物低氧细胞毒性的增加来解释。加热后这两种硝基咪唑类药物也没有在肿瘤中蓄积。因此,药代动力学的改变不是硝基咪唑类药物放射增敏热增强的主要机制。在高温下,METRO的放射增敏作用与MISO相同,这在临床放射增敏中尤为重要。METRO在高温下极低的局部和全身毒性以及高效性使其成为未来临床放射增敏剂的一个有吸引力的候选药物。