Meyer W H, Kun L, Marina N, Roberson P, Parham D, Rao B, Fletcher B, Pratt C B
Department of Hematology-Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38101-0318.
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Nov;10(11):1737-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.11.1737.
We assessed the activity of ifosfamide plus etoposide against newly diagnosed Ewing's sarcoma of bone by administering this drug pair before standard induction therapy (the upfront window approach).
Twenty-six children and adolescents with newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ewing's sarcoma of bone were enrolled onto this pilot study (EW-87). Eighteen were at a higher risk of treatment failure, with a primary tumor size of more than 8 cm or metastases at diagnosis. Window therapy with ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2/d with mesna uroprotection) and etoposide (100 mg/m2/d) was given in three 5-day cycles at 21-day intervals. Responses were evaluated clinically and radiologically. Subsequent induction therapy comprised three cycles of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. Radiation therapy was the primary local control modality; surgery was limited to biopsy or resection of expendable bones. After the local control phase, alternating courses of vincristine plus dactinomycin, ifosfamide plus etoposide, and cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin were given as maintenance therapy.
There were four complete responses and 21 partial responses to ifosfamide/etoposide window therapy (overall response rate 96%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80% to 99%). Disease progression was observed in four patients during the cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin phase. Chemotherapy was well tolerated; only 16% (20 of 125) of all ifosfamide/etoposide window and maintenance cycles resulted in hospitalization for fever and neutropenia. Two patients developed chemotherapy-induced cystitis.
The combination of ifosfamide and etoposide is highly active against previously untreated Ewing's sarcoma and generally is well tolerated. The ultimate impact of these two agents on outcome will be determined in randomized multicenter studies.
通过在标准诱导治疗前给予异环磷酰胺联合依托泊苷(前期窗口期方法),评估其对新诊断的骨尤文肉瘤的活性。
26例新诊断、既往未接受治疗的骨尤文肉瘤儿童和青少年纳入该初步研究(EW - 87)。18例存在较高治疗失败风险,诊断时原发肿瘤大小超过8 cm或有转移。给予异环磷酰胺(1.6 g/m²/d,用美司钠进行尿路保护)和依托泊苷(100 mg/m²/d)进行窗口期治疗,每21天为一个周期,共三个5天周期。通过临床和影像学评估反应。随后的诱导治疗包括三个周期的环磷酰胺和多柔比星。放射治疗是主要的局部控制方式;手术仅限于活检或切除可切除的骨骼。在局部控制阶段后,交替给予长春新碱联合放线菌素D、异环磷酰胺联合依托泊苷以及环磷酰胺联合多柔比星作为维持治疗。
异环磷酰胺/依托泊苷窗口期治疗有4例完全缓解和21例部分缓解(总缓解率96%;95%置信区间[CI]为80%至99%)。在环磷酰胺/多柔比星阶段观察到4例疾病进展。化疗耐受性良好;所有异环磷酰胺/依托泊苷窗口期和维持周期中仅有16%(125个周期中的20个)因发热和中性粒细胞减少导致住院。2例患者发生化疗诱导性膀胱炎。
异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷联合对既往未治疗的尤文肉瘤具有高活性,且总体耐受性良好。这两种药物对结局的最终影响将在随机多中心研究中确定。