Kohler H, Goudsmit J, Nara P
San Diego Regional Cancer Center, California.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988). 1992;5(11):1158-68.
Oligoclonal and monoclonal antibody populations against different HIV-encoded proteins are common in sera from healthy HIV-1-infected individuals. This is especially important when it includes functional antibody repertoires directed at neutralizing cell free virus or inhibiting cell fusion of virus-infected cells. In the host, during the acute viral syndrome following HIV-1 infection, a rapidly replicating, cell-free and genotypically homogeneous viral population is known to arise from the transmitted viral inoculum. Dominant B and possibly T cell clones responsible for both functional and nonfunctional antibodies appear to arise early in response to this initially homogeneous cell-free viral population heralding seroconversion. During the viremic phase, deposition of cell-free virus as either complement coated or as immune complexes (iccosomes) within the germinal centers results in continued and long-term boosting of primed B cells. This saturation of antigen presenting germinal centers and the presence of limited, immunodominant cross-reactive epitopes on the envelope glycoprotein of the closely-related and immune selected viral quasispecies in the host appear to continue the boosting effect of the primed secondary response. This repertoire freeze appears to be responsible for limiting the recruitment of new uncommitted B cells to other functional epitopes or affinity maturation of B-cell clones to escape variants and the subsequent production and quality of functional antibody against the evolving/selected virus populations. This may include in addition to neutralizing and cell fusion inhibiting antibody, direct complement-fixing and/or NK-directed antibody-dependent cell-mediated antibody as well as various effector, helper, or T cell-mediated activity. In addition to antiviral antibody responses, antibody directed to other invading pathogens or opportunistic organisms may also be clonaly restricted. Antibody facilitating infectivity or blocking effective immunity may also be included in this phenomena and thus be over represented by such a mechanism. AIDS vaccines utilizing the envelope must identify these epitopes to avoid creating clonal dominance and therefore possibly limit the breadth and specificity of a humoral response following infection. Furthermore, immunotherapeutic approaches designed to recruit humoral immune effector function must be able to overcome the dominance of noneffective antibodies and restore a normal polyclonal immune response against HIV. Further research, therefore, into the humoral and cellular dysregulating properties of the HIV-1 envelope is warranted.
在健康的HIV-1感染者血清中,针对不同HIV编码蛋白的寡克隆和单克隆抗体群体很常见。当其中包括针对中和游离病毒或抑制病毒感染细胞的细胞融合的功能性抗体库时,这一点尤为重要。在宿主中,HIV-1感染后的急性病毒综合征期间,已知从传播的病毒接种物中会产生快速复制、游离且基因分型均一的病毒群体。负责功能性和非功能性抗体的主要B细胞克隆以及可能的T细胞克隆似乎在对这种最初均一的游离病毒群体做出反应时早期就出现了,这预示着血清转化。在病毒血症阶段,游离病毒以补体包被或免疫复合物(iccosomes)的形式沉积在生发中心内,导致已致敏B细胞持续且长期地得到增强。抗原呈递生发中心的这种饱和状态以及宿主中密切相关且经免疫选择的病毒准种包膜糖蛋白上有限的、免疫显性交叉反应表位的存在,似乎会持续增强已致敏二次反应的效果。这种抗体库停滞似乎是限制新的未致敏B细胞募集到其他功能性表位的原因,也是限制B细胞克隆亲和力成熟以逃避变异体以及随后针对不断演变/选择的病毒群体产生功能性抗体及其质量的原因。这可能包括除中和和抑制细胞融合的抗体之外,直接补体结合和/或自然杀伤细胞定向的抗体依赖性细胞介导抗体,以及各种效应、辅助或T细胞介导的活性。除了抗病毒抗体反应外,针对其他入侵病原体或机会性生物体的抗体也可能受到克隆限制。促进感染性或阻断有效免疫的抗体也可能包含在这种现象中,因此可能因这种机制而过度存在。利用包膜的艾滋病疫苗必须识别这些表位,以避免产生克隆优势,从而可能限制感染后体液反应的广度和特异性。此外,旨在募集体液免疫效应功能的免疫治疗方法必须能够克服无效抗体的优势,并恢复针对HIV的正常多克隆免疫反应。因此,有必要对HIV-1包膜的体液和细胞失调特性进行进一步研究。