• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

套筒铸造冠/核系统与粘结在传统铸造核上的冠的固位性能比较。

Comparison of the retentive properties of a sleeve cast crown/core system with crowns cemented to conventional cast cores.

作者信息

Cohen B I, Deutsch A S, Condos S, Musikant B L

机构信息

Essential Dental Laboratories, South Hackensack, N.J.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jul;68(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90287-k.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90287-k
PMID:1403923
Abstract

The retention of the crown to the core substructure is of great importance for a successful restoration. The aim of this study was to compare the retentive values of the Flexi-Cast post and its sleeve crown/core complex with that of a crown cemented to a conventional cast post. Forty single-rooted teeth divided equally into four groups were used. Flexi-Cast crown and cores were cemented to Flexi-Cast posts in groups 1 through 3. Group 4, the control group, comprised crowns cemented to conventional cast cores. Groups 1 through 4 had retentive values of 126.2, 135.5, 185.0, and 79.3 lb, respectively. Statistically, the increase in retention for all sizes of the Flexi-Cast crown and cores when compared with the control cast post and crown was found to be significant (p less than or equal to 0.0001).

摘要

对于成功修复而言,牙冠与核子结构的固位至关重要。本研究的目的是比较Flexi-Cast桩及其套筒冠/核复合体与粘结在传统铸造桩上的牙冠的固位值。使用40颗单根牙,平均分为四组。第1至3组中,Flexi-Cast冠和核粘结在Flexi-Cast桩上。第4组为对照组,包括粘结在传统铸造核上的牙冠。第1至4组的固位值分别为126.2、135.5、185.0和79.3磅。统计学上,与对照铸造桩和牙冠相比,所有尺寸的Flexi-Cast冠和核的固位增加均具有显著性(p小于或等于0.0001)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the retentive properties of a sleeve cast crown/core system with crowns cemented to conventional cast cores.套筒铸造冠/核系统与粘结在传统铸造核上的冠的固位性能比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jul;68(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90287-k.
2
Retentive properties of attachment sleeves for a new cast-post system.一种新型铸造桩系统附着套筒的固位性能
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jan;67(1):34-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90044-b.
3
Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems.四种桩系统固位性能的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Aug;68(2):264-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90327-7.
4
Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.用两种粘结剂粘结的铸造商业纯钛桩核及铸造金合金桩核的拉伸粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60030-X.
5
Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques.使用不同粘结技术用磷酸锌水门汀粘结的铸造桩的固位情况。
J Prosthodont. 2001 Mar;10(1):37-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2001.00037.x.
6
Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.使用标准化牙冠预备,牙本质脱敏剂和粘结剂对全冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):459-65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70042-4.
7
Effect of prolonged ultrasonic instrumentation on the retention of cemented cast crowns.长时间超声器械操作对粘结铸造全冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Nov;64(5):563-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90128-y.
8
Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns.桩核设计对行全冠修复的根管治疗牙抗折性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jan;69(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90237-i.
9
Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.用于铸造桩核固位的两种粘结剂的比较。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Sep;14(3):164-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00349.x.
10
Effects of clasp retention forces and abrasion on different cast crowns.卡环固位力和磨损对不同铸造冠的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jun;111(6):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.025. Epub 2014 Jan 11.