Thompson L H
Human Resources Division, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 20548.
Milbank Q. 1992;70(3):417-22.
A commentary on the article by Brian Abel-Smith briefly explores why the United States lags behind Europe in controlling health care costs. Three important factors are, first, that until recently the real cost of health insurance was not apparent to U.S. workers and political leaders; second, Americans prefer to try competition before resorting to other strategies; and third, responsibility for financing health care is divided among a large number of independent entities, while government regulation is split between the state and federal levels. At the same time, governments and private insurers in the United States have developed new health delivery structures and reimbursement mechanisms that the Europeans may find useful. A convergence of the two systems would be to the benefit of both.
一篇对布莱恩·阿贝尔 - 史密斯文章的评论简要探讨了美国在控制医疗成本方面落后于欧洲的原因。三个重要因素如下:其一,直到最近,医疗保险的实际成本对于美国工人和政治领导人来说并不明显;其二,美国人在诉诸其他策略之前更倾向于尝试竞争;其三,医疗保健融资责任由大量独立实体分担,而政府监管则在州和联邦层面之间分割。与此同时,美国的政府和私人保险公司已经开发出一些欧洲人可能会觉得有用的新的医疗服务提供结构和报销机制。两种体系的融合将对双方都有益。