Differential effects of congenital versus acquired unilateral brain injury on dichotic listening performance: evidence for sparing and asymmetric crowding.

We assessed dichotic speech and complex-pitch discrimination in nine young patients with unilateral left-hemisphere injury and eight young patients with unilateral right-hemisphere injury incurred in the pre-perinatal (congenital) period. As in adults with acquired unilateral lesions, both congenital lesion groups demonstrated poor performance on stimuli presented to the ear contralateral to the lesion. In overall performance on speech discrimination, however, the left-hemisphere congenital lesion group performed significantly better than the acquired-lesion group did. On complex-pitch discrimination, the right-hemisphere congenital lesion group performed significantly better than did the acquired-lesion group, but both left- and right-hemisphere congenital lesion groups were significantly worse at complex-pitch discrimination than were their age- and gender-matched normal controls. These results indicate that although congenital damage produces a "lesion effect" in dichotic listening similar to that after damage acquired in adulthood, overall function is relatively spared. To the extent that complex-pitch discrimination is affected by congenital damage to either hemisphere but speech discrimination is not, the present results are consistent with an asymmetric form of crowding during reorganization after congenital unilateral brain damage.