• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

书面协议和实践标准的法律风险。

The legal danger of written protocols and standards of practice.

作者信息

Moniz D M

机构信息

Rosenow, Johnson, Graffe, Keay, Pomeroy & Moniz, Seattle.

出版信息

Nurse Pract. 1992 Sep;17(9):58-60. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199209000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/00006205-199209000-00015
PMID:1407771
Abstract

Nurse practitioners have historically developed protocols and standards of practice to guide and improve the quality of their patient care. Written protocols and standards of practice can, however, create a potential malpractice problem. Lawyers who bring malpractice cases on behalf of patients will use the protocols and standards to measure the practitioner's care. The practice standards are often too high to be reasonably met by practitioners at all times and in all settings. As a result, the practitioner's care may breach those standards. Nurse practitioners should develop protocols that are based on a minimum safe level and not the maximum level aimed at ideal care. Standards and protocols should be updated and realistic. Once developed, protocols and standards must be followed precisely to limit potential liability.

摘要

从历史上看,执业护士制定了诊疗规范和执业标准,以指导和提高患者护理质量。然而,书面的诊疗规范和执业标准可能会引发潜在的医疗事故问题。代表患者提起医疗事故诉讼的律师会利用这些规范和标准来衡量从业者的护理情况。这些执业标准往往过高,从业者在任何时候、任何情况下都难以完全达到。因此,从业者的护理可能会违反这些标准。执业护士应制定基于最低安全水平而非旨在理想护理的最高水平的诊疗规范。标准和规范应与时俱进且切实可行。一旦制定,必须严格遵循诊疗规范和标准,以限制潜在的责任。

相似文献

1
The legal danger of written protocols and standards of practice.书面协议和实践标准的法律风险。
Nurse Pract. 1992 Sep;17(9):58-60. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199209000-00015.
2
Litigation, electronic fetal monitoring, and the obstetric nurse.诉讼、电子胎儿监护与产科护士。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1993 Sep-Oct;22(5):410-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1993.tb01824.x.
3
Understanding a civil trial.
Adv Nurse Pract. 1999 Aug;7(8):25.
4
The advent of clinical standards for professional liability.职业责任临床标准的出现。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990 Feb;16(2):71-9. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30342-6.
5
Legal implications of standards of care.护理标准的法律含义。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1991 Mar-Apr;10(2):96-102. doi: 10.1097/00003465-199103000-00010.
6
The Extraregulatory Effect of Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Laws on Physician Malpractice Rates.执业护士执业范围法律对医生医疗事故发生率的额外监管效应。
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Jun;75(3):312-326. doi: 10.1177/1077558716686889. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
7
The changing face of medical negligence law: from Bolam to Bolitho.医疗过失法的演变:从博勒姆案到博利托案。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008 Jun;69(6):335-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2008.69.6.29623.
8
MS: nurse practitioner's affidavit barred: nurse expert's testimony held inadmissible.医疗补助服务中心:执业护士宣誓书被禁止:护士专家的证词被裁定不可采信。
Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2000 Mar;40(10):3.
9
Practice guidelines in psychiatry and their implications for malpractice.精神病学实践指南及其对医疗事故的影响。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;43(4):341-2. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.4.341.
10
Malpractice. How to survive a deposition.
Med Econ. 2005 Jun 3;82(11):45-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Process-related factors associated with disciplinary board decisions.与纪律处分委员会决策相关的过程相关因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 7;13:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-9.
2
The family physician-nurse practitioner dyad: indications and guidelines.家庭医生与执业护士组合:适应证与指南
CMAJ. 1994 Jul 1;151(1):29-34.