Winn B, Gilmartin B
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Glasgow Polytechnic, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Apr;12(2):252-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00301.x.
The collaboration of Fergus Campbell, Gerald Westheimer and John Robson in the 1950s produced insight into the nature of accommodation microfluctuations and instigated work which has led to the current view that the nominally steady-state accommodation response exhibits temporal variations which can be characterized by two dominant regions of activity: a low-frequency component (LFC less than 0.6 Hz) and a high-frequency component (HFC greater than or equal to 1.0 less than or equal to 2.3 Hz). A functional role has been attributed to these microfluctuations as they offer a means by which a directional cue could be derived from an even-error stimulus. However, there is no consensus regarding the respective contribution made by each of the dominant components in the accommodation control process. Using a newly-designed measurement and recording system we have conducted a series of experiments to investigate the nature and aetiology of the microfluctuations. The incidence and magnitude of microfluctuations in LFCs and HFCs for central and peripheral lens zones were investigated while five young emmetropic subjects viewed a near target. The form of the power spectra of the fluctuations was found to be similar for central and peripheral zones although an overall reduction in magnitude was observed in the periphery. The HFCs are thus a consistent feature of microfluctuations in central zones and not, as previously suggested, merely a spurious feature of peripheral zones. A significant between-subject variation in the location of HFCs was found and led us to consider the relationship between HFCs and other physiological systems which provide intraocular rhythmic variation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
20世纪50年代,弗格斯·坎贝尔、杰拉尔德·韦斯特海默和约翰·罗布森的合作让人们深入了解了调节微波动的本质,并推动了相关研究工作,这些研究形成了目前的观点,即名义上的稳态调节反应呈现出随时间的变化,这种变化可由两个主要活动区域来表征:低频成分(LFC小于0.6赫兹)和高频成分(HFC大于或等于1.0且小于或等于2.3赫兹)。这些微波动被认为具有功能性作用,因为它们提供了一种从均匀误差刺激中获取方向线索的方式。然而,对于调节控制过程中每个主要成分各自的贡献,目前尚无共识。我们使用新设计的测量和记录系统进行了一系列实验,以研究微波动的本质和病因。在五名年轻正视眼受试者观看近目标时,研究了中央和周边晶状体区域LFC和HFC中微波动的发生率和幅度。结果发现,中央和周边区域波动的功率谱形式相似,尽管周边区域的幅度总体有所降低。因此,HFC是中央区域微波动的一个一致特征,而不像之前所认为的那样,仅仅是周边区域的一个虚假特征。我们发现HFC的位置在受试者之间存在显著差异,这使我们开始考虑HFC与其他提供眼内节律变化的生理系统之间的关系。(摘要截选至250词)