The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Sensory and Sensorimotor Systems, Max Planck Institute of Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):10983. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90371-8.
To clearly view approaching objects, the eyes rotate inward (vergence), and the intraocular lenses focus (accommodation). Current ocular control models assume both eyes are driven by unitary vergence and unitary accommodation commands that causally interact. The models typically describe discrete gaze shifts to non-accommodative targets performed under laboratory conditions. We probe these unitary signals using a physical stimulus moving in depth on the midline while recording vergence and accommodation simultaneously from both eyes in normal observers. Using monocular viewing, retinal disparity is removed, leaving only monocular cues for interpreting the object's motion in depth. The viewing eye always followed the target's motion. However, the occluded eye did not follow the target, and surprisingly, rotated out of phase with it. In contrast, accommodation in both eyes was synchronized with the target under monocular viewing. The results challenge existing unitary vergence command theories, and causal accommodation-vergence linkage.
为了清晰地观察靠近的物体,眼睛向内转动(会聚),眼内晶状体聚焦(调节)。当前的眼部控制模型假设双眼都受到单一的会聚和调节命令的驱动,这些命令会产生因果相互作用。这些模型通常描述了在实验室条件下,对非调节性目标进行离散的注视转移。我们使用中线深度移动的物理刺激物来探测这些单一信号,同时从正常观察者的双眼记录会聚和调节。使用单眼观察,去除了视网膜差异,只剩下单眼线索来解释物体在深度上的运动。注视眼总是跟随目标的运动。然而,被遮挡的眼睛并没有跟随目标,而且令人惊讶的是,它与目标的旋转相位相反。相比之下,在单眼观察下,两只眼睛的调节是与目标同步的。结果对现有的单一会聚命令理论和因果调节-会聚联系提出了挑战。