Chu D K
Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610-2395.
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Oct;35(7):857-68. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90100-5.
Policy-makers in industrialized countries face the dilemma of having to contain soaring hospital costs while resisting any reduction in the quality and quantity of hospital services. Among the many hospital financing systems, centralized control via global budgeting is advocated by some to be the most effective in containing hospital costs. Containing hospital costs, however, is but one aspect of the trade-off between cost containment and quality of care. The hospital financing system of Hong Kong provides some insights into the extent to which cost control can be achieved through global budgeting; and its impact on the accessibility of hospital care. The case of Hong Kong highlights three necessary conditions for effective cost control: (1) the payer must have a clear policy stance on overall public spending; (2) the payer must have a clear policy stance on the importance of hospital care relative to other goods and services; and (3) the payer must also have the will and ability to limit hospital spending within finalized global budgets. However, successful cost containment in Hong Kong affects the accessibility of hospital care. In a time of population growth and economic prosperity, new community needs seem to have preceded government plans and actions to build hospital facilities.
既要控制医院成本的飙升,又要抵制医院服务质量和数量的任何下降。在众多医院融资体系中,一些人主张通过总额预算进行集中控制是控制医院成本最有效的方法。然而,控制医院成本只是成本控制与医疗质量之间权衡的一个方面。香港的医院融资体系为通过总额预算实现成本控制的程度及其对医院服务可及性的影响提供了一些见解。香港的案例突出了有效成本控制的三个必要条件:(1)支付方必须对总体公共支出有明确的政策立场;(2)支付方必须对医院护理相对于其他商品和服务的重要性有明确的政策立场;(3)支付方还必须有意愿和能力在最终确定的总额预算内限制医院支出。然而,香港成功的成本控制影响了医院服务的可及性。在人口增长和经济繁荣时期,新的社区需求似乎先于政府建设医院设施的计划和行动。