Suppr超能文献

Prospective randomized study to compare a closed vault technique using absorbable staples at the time of abdominal hysterectomy versus open vault technique.

作者信息

Kalbfleisch R E

机构信息

Uro-gynecologic Unit, McMaster University Clinic, Henderson General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Oct;175(4):337-40.

PMID:1411891
Abstract

The current prospective randomized study in 102 women having a hysterectomy compared closed vault technique using absorbable staples with open vault technique. Fifty-six patients had the cuff stapled while 46 patients had the vault sutured open. The groups were equivalent with respect to indications for operation as well as other surgical procedures performed in conjunction with the hysterectomy, although more patients were randomized to open vault. No patient left the study. Operating time in the group with staples was 24 minutes (standard deviation of seven minutes) compared with 33 minutes (standard deviation of eight minutes) with the group with the open vault (p<0.0001). Hemostasis was also better in the group with staples (p<0.0001). The frequency of postoperative granulation tissue at the apex of the vaginal vault and the incidence of vaginal discharge during 12 weeks of follow-up evaluation were also less in the group with staples.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验