Rosaschino P, Palmerio G, Zambetti E, Gambarini A
Divisione Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Ospedale Bolognini, Seriate.
Minerva Ginecol. 1995 Apr;47(4):143-6.
One hundred and four patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 56) included patients in whom used absorbable staples in vaginal cuff closure; group 2 (n = 48) included patients with classical abdominal hysterectomy. Operating time, facility and outcome 6 months later, were evaluated. Greater costs of absorbable staples compared with sutures can readily be counterbalanced by saving allowed by shorter operating time, no peritoneal contamination, minimal tissue trauma and better cuff healing.
104例患者被随机分为两组：第1组（n = 56）包括使用可吸收吻合器闭合阴道残端的患者；第2组（n = 48）包括接受经典腹式子宫切除术的患者。对手术时间、便利性及6个月后的结局进行了评估。与缝线相比，可吸收吻合器成本更高，但可通过缩短手术时间、无腹腔污染、最小化组织创伤及更好的残端愈合所节省的费用来轻松抵消。
