Hildebrandt G, Bauer T, Stracke H, Fassbender W J, Mueller H W, Agnoli A L, Federlin K, Roosen K
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Giessen/Germany.
Zentralbl Neurochir. 1992;53(3):123-34.
In a non-randomized retrospective study n = 36 prolactinoma patients (n = 7 micro- and n = 29 macroadenomas) were evaluated before (E0), 4 (E1) and 52 weeks (E2) after applying 3 different treatment modalities: A dopamine agonist (DA) therapy (n = 14), B surgery as initial procedure (n = 12) and oral DA therapy, C DA preinjection, subsequent surgery (n = 10) and oral DA medication. T0 outline the effect of the 3 regimens upon serum prolactin (PRL) and tumour size reduction, clinical signs and symptoms, anterior/posterior pituitary lobe function and MRI/CT findings were evaluated in each patient at E0, E1 and E2. In group A, PRL normalization was achieved in n = 10 patients (71%), although the frequency of an empty sella was only one out of 12 macroprolactinoma patients (less than 10%). Patients of group C showed the lowest PRLE2 levels (32 +/- 11 ng/ml, normalization rate 60%), although not statistically significant when compared with the other groups (A: 41 +/- 28 ng/ml, B: 114 +/- 33 ng/ml, normalization rate 31%). According to MRI studies in groups B and C total removal was achieved in 33% and 50% of macroprolactinomas, respectively. The most favourable ratio of the leading pre/posttreatment signs and symptoms was observed in patients of group C. It was concluded that no superiority of either treatment regimen exists for prolactinoma patients. Each mode of therapy has its own benefits which may be applied to the different biological behaviour of a prolactinoma in the respective patient.
在一项非随机回顾性研究中,对36例催乳素瘤患者(7例微腺瘤和29例大腺瘤)在应用3种不同治疗方式前(E0)、4周后(E1)和52周后(E2)进行了评估:A组为多巴胺激动剂(DA)治疗(14例),B组以手术作为初始治疗手段(12例)并联合口服DA治疗,C组为先注射DA,随后手术(10例)并口服DA药物。T0概述了这3种治疗方案对血清催乳素(PRL)和肿瘤缩小、临床体征和症状、垂体前叶/后叶功能以及MRI/CT检查结果的影响,在E0、E1和E2时对每位患者进行了评估。在A组中,10例患者(71%)实现了PRL正常化,尽管空蝶鞍的发生率在12例大催乳素瘤患者中仅为1例(不到10%)。C组患者的PRLE2水平最低(32±11 ng/ml,正常化率60%),但与其他组相比无统计学意义(A组:41±28 ng/ml,B组:114±33 ng/ml,正常化率31%)。根据MRI研究,B组和C组分别有33%和50%的大催乳素瘤实现了完全切除。C组患者治疗前后主要体征和症状的比例最为有利。得出的结论是,对于催乳素瘤患者,没有一种治疗方案具有优越性。每种治疗方式都有其自身的益处,可应用于各个患者催乳素瘤不同的生物学行为。