FELSENFELD O, NASUNIYA N, WATANABE Y, PENA A, DALE B N
Bull World Health Organ. 1964;30(6):833-44.
There is a lack of agreement as to the significance of agglutination test results in cholera, and recent epidemics of "classic" Vibrio comma and El Tor infections have provided an opportunity to compare this test with two other serological procedures recently introduced in cholera work. These are determination of the circulating antitoxin expressed as the lethal toxin neutralizing power of a serum, and determination of the haemolysin neutralizing power through serial test-tube dilutions.Applying these tests to sera from cholera patients, convalescents, carriers and contacts and from immunized persons either exposed or not exposed to cholera, the authors found the agglutination test to be a less sensitive indicator of the immunological status than the other two procedures. They therefore recommend antitoxin and antihaemolysin titration for the study of cholera patients, convalescents and carriers. In the conditions of the experiments described, the results with exposed and non-exposed vaccinated individuals were less conclusive, but nevertheless suggest that antitoxin and antihaemolysin tests may be helpful in the follow-up of vaccination experiments.
关于霍乱凝集试验结果的意义,目前尚无定论。最近发生的“典型”霍乱弧菌和埃尔托弧菌感染疫情,为将该试验与霍乱研究中最近引入的另外两种血清学方法进行比较提供了契机。这两种方法分别是测定血清中循环抗毒素的含量,以血清的致死毒素中和能力来表示;以及通过连续试管稀释法测定溶血素中和能力。通过将这些试验应用于霍乱患者、康复者、带菌者、接触者以及接种过疫苗者(无论是否接触过霍乱)的血清,作者发现凝集试验作为免疫状态的指标,不如另外两种方法敏感。因此,他们建议采用抗毒素和抗溶血素滴定法来研究霍乱患者、康复者和带菌者。在所描述的实验条件下,接种过疫苗的接触者和未接触者的试验结果不太具有决定性,但尽管如此,仍表明抗毒素和抗溶血素试验可能有助于疫苗接种实验的后续研究。