Mountcastle V B, Atluri P P, Romo R
Philip Bard Laboratories of Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Cereb Cortex. 1992 Jul-Aug;2(4):277-94. doi: 10.1093/cercor/2.4.277.
Monkeys and humans have similar capacities to discriminate between the frequencies of mechanical sinusoids delivered to the glabrous skin of their hands. Combined psychophysical-electrophysiological experiments in monkeys discriminating in the range of flutter provided evidence that this capacity depends upon differences in the cycle lengths in the sets of periodically entrained activity, evoked by the stimuli discriminated, in neurons of areas 3b and 1 of the (sensory) hemisphere opposite the stimulated hand. Identical experiments have now been made, in similarly trained and discriminating monkeys, in the motor cortex (area 4) of the hemisphere opposite the arm projecting selectively to one of two targets, to indicate discrimination (five hemispheres, 1137 neurons studied). We observed a selective signal of the upcoming correct discrimination in about 25% of the neurons of area 4 active in the task. The neuronal discharge occurs selectively for stimuli either lower or higher in frequency than that of the base stimulus, and commonly begins within 200-300 msec after onset of the comparison stimulus. These neuronal discharges are aperiodic, with no sign of the stimulus frequencies. EMG recording during performance of the discrimination showed that the muscles of the arm opposite the side of recording were silent during the period of stimulus presentations. Recordings during trials in which the animal made errors showed most commonly that the output of the discrimination operation was itself in error, followed by an appropriate arm projection to the wrong target. We interpret the selective response during the comparison stimulus to be a postdiscrimination signal projected transcallosally from the sensory hemisphere to the motor area of the hemisphere controlling the responding arm. We obtained no evidence that the discrimination operation is localized to any particular area, and we surmise it to occur in the dynamic activity within the distributed system linking the sensory cortex of one hemisphere and the motor cortex of the other. One-third of the neurons of the motor cortex responded to indentation of the skin of the ipsilateral hand, at trial onset. These responses varied from those closely linked to that sensory stimulus to those linked to the upcoming movement of the contralateral hand. These onset responses did not occur when similar sequences of mechanical stimuli were delivered to alert but idling monkeys.
猴子和人类在辨别施加于其手部无毛皮肤的机械正弦波频率方面具有相似的能力。在猴子身上进行的结合心理物理学和电生理学的实验,这些猴子在颤振范围内进行辨别,结果表明这种能力取决于在受刺激手对侧(感觉)半球的3b区和1区神经元中,由被辨别刺激诱发的周期性夹带活动组中周期长度的差异。现在,在经过类似训练且具备辨别能力的猴子身上,在与选择性投射到两个目标之一的手臂相对的半球的运动皮层(4区)进行了相同的实验,以表明辨别情况(研究了五个半球,1137个神经元)。我们在任务中活跃的4区约25%的神经元中观察到即将进行正确辨别的选择性信号。神经元放电选择性地发生在频率低于或高于基础刺激频率的刺激时,并且通常在比较刺激开始后200 - 300毫秒内开始。这些神经元放电是无周期性的,没有刺激频率的迹象。辨别过程中的肌电图记录表明,在刺激呈现期间,记录侧对侧手臂的肌肉处于静止状态。在动物犯错的试验中的记录最常见的情况是,辨别操作的输出本身出现错误,随后是手臂向错误目标的适当投射。我们将比较刺激期间的选择性反应解释为从感觉半球经胼胝体投射到控制反应手臂的半球运动区域的辨别后信号。我们没有获得证据表明辨别操作定位于任何特定区域,并推测它发生在连接一个半球的感觉皮层和另一个半球的运动皮层的分布式系统内的动态活动中。运动皮层三分之一的神经元在试验开始时对同侧手部皮肤的压痕有反应。这些反应从与该感觉刺激紧密相关的反应到与对侧手部即将到来的运动相关的反应各不相同。当向警觉但闲置的猴子施加类似的机械刺激序列时,这些起始反应并未出现。