Demski L S
Division of Natural Sciences, New College of the University of South Florida, Sarasota 34243.
Brain Behav Evol. 1992;40(2-3):141-56. doi: 10.1159/000113909.
The neural control of chromatophore display in cephalopod mollusks and teleost fishes is reviewed in the context of convergence of functional-anatomical pathways and mechanisms at several levels of organization. The effector elements or chromatophores are different in origin and design in the two groups of animals. Major functional differences appear to be in the speed of response (greatest in cephalopods) and the magnitude of non-neural control mechanisms (greatest in teleosts). Despite the differences, the elements demonstrate striking overall functional similarity. Elements of different types form highly organized array patterns of similar general complexity. Innervation patterns in cephalopods and teleosts seem comparable, with control being unidirectional (albeit in opposite directions); some elements demonstrate polyaxonal innervation. Motor units in both groups are generally composed of many chromatophores. Packard's concept of 'cronological units' of similar age-classes of chromatophores being innervated by similar age-classes of motor neurons greatly simplifies the understanding of relationships between the static arrays and the physiological units that utilize them to produce chromatic displays. The lower motor control areas for both groups have been grossly identified. Chromatomotor neurons in cephalopods are mostly located in the chromatophore lobes of the subesophageal brain while comparable systems in teleosts are situated in sympathetic chain ganglia (preganglionics) and the rostral spinal cord (postganglionics). Chromatic components are the simplest visually detectable units of color display, e.g. vertical bands and fin spots. They combine to form more complex chromatic patterns, which, in turn, are integrated with components of skin texture, posture and movement to produce display behaviors. Complexity of such systems seems to be of the same order of magnitude in both cephalopods and teleosts. Areas of the CNS related to each of the categorical levels have not been clearly defined. Crude patterning may take place in the basal and, perhaps, peduncle lobes in cephalopods and in the lower and intermediate medulla in teleosts. In both groups, higher level control relates to areas involved in sensorimotor integration and mediation of agonistic, sexual, and, perhaps, other types of behavior: the peduncle and optic lobes in cephalopods and the hypothalamus, tegmentum, otic tectum, torus semicircularis, thalamus and telencephalon in fishes. The systems appear to parallel each other in being organized hierarchically, with similar levels of complexity. Some of the regions may be especially important for regulating color patterns in response to visual input. Overall, chromatomotor control systems in cephalopods and teleosts demonstrate many apparent convergent features. Possible factors responsible for the similarities are discussed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本文在功能解剖学通路和机制在多个组织层次上的汇聚背景下,综述了头足类软体动物和硬骨鱼类中色素细胞展示的神经控制。这两类动物的效应器元件即色素细胞在起源和设计上有所不同。主要的功能差异似乎在于反应速度(头足类动物中最快)和非神经控制机制的程度(硬骨鱼类中最大)。尽管存在差异,但这些元件在整体功能上表现出显著的相似性。不同类型的元件形成了具有相似总体复杂性的高度有组织的阵列模式。头足类动物和硬骨鱼类的神经支配模式似乎具有可比性,控制是单向的(尽管方向相反);一些元件表现出多轴突神经支配。这两类动物的运动单位通常都由许多色素细胞组成。帕卡德提出的由相似年龄组的运动神经元支配相似年龄组色素细胞的“时间单位”概念,极大地简化了对静态阵列与利用它们产生色彩展示的生理单位之间关系的理解。这两类动物的低级运动控制区域已大致确定。头足类动物的色素运动神经元大多位于食管下脑的色素细胞叶中,而硬骨鱼类的类似系统则位于交感神经链神经节(节前)和延髓前部脊髓(节后)中。色彩成分是颜色展示中最简单的视觉可检测单位,例如垂直条纹和鳍斑。它们组合形成更复杂的色彩模式,进而与皮肤纹理、姿势和运动成分整合,以产生展示行为。头足类动物和硬骨鱼类中此类系统的复杂性似乎处于同一量级。与每个分类层次相关的中枢神经系统区域尚未明确界定。粗略的模式形成可能发生在头足类动物的基底叶和或许还有脑桥叶以及硬骨鱼类的延髓下部和中部。在这两类动物中,高级控制与参与感觉运动整合以及争斗、性行为和或许其他类型行为调节的区域有关:头足类动物的脑桥叶和视叶,以及鱼类的下丘脑、被盖、耳叶、半规管隆起、丘脑和端脑。这些系统在层次组织上似乎相互平行,具有相似的复杂程度。其中一些区域可能对于响应视觉输入调节颜色模式尤为重要。总体而言,头足类动物和硬骨鱼类的色素运动控制系统表现出许多明显的趋同特征。文中讨论了造成这些相似性的可能因素。(摘要截选至400字)