• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[局部麻醉剂温度对使用0.5%布比卡因的脊髓麻醉的影响]

[The effect of the local anesthetic temperature on spinal anesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine].

作者信息

Mignonsin D, Tavares D A, Kane M, Bondurand A

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie, Abidjan, RCI.

出版信息

Cah Anesthesiol. 1992;40(5):337-41.

PMID:1422931
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine at 20 degrees C and 5 degrees C. One hundred two patients ASA I-II were randomized into two groups. After atropine and IV fluid administration, patients of group I received intrathecally at L3-L4 level 0.02 ml.cm-1 of plain 0.5% bupivacaine at 20 degrees C, while patients of group II received the same solution and the same doses but at 5 degrees C. No significant difference was found between the times for installation of sensory and motor blocks nor between the durations of motor block in the two groups. On the other hand significant differences were found between the durations of sensory block in group I (283.33 min +/- 9.40 min) and group II (314.35 +/- 8.80 min) (P < 0.001) and all the more (P < 10(-9)) between the cephalad block extensions in group I (D 7.45 +/- 0.14) and group II (D 4.82 +/- 0.20). Therefore plain bupivacaine 0.5%, isobaric at 20 degrees C, seems to get the properties of an hyperbaric solution when cooled at 5 degrees C.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较20℃和5℃时0.5%布比卡因的脊髓麻醉效果。102例ASA I-II级患者被随机分为两组。给予阿托品和静脉输液后,I组患者在L3-L4水平鞘内注射20℃的0.5%布比卡因原液,剂量为0.02 ml·cm-1,而II组患者接受相同溶液和相同剂量,但温度为5℃。两组在感觉和运动阻滞起效时间以及运动阻滞持续时间方面均未发现显著差异。另一方面,I组(283.33分钟±9.40分钟)和II组(314.35±8.80分钟)的感觉阻滞持续时间之间存在显著差异(P<0.001),I组(D 7.45±0.14)和II组(D 4.82±0.20)的头端阻滞范围之间差异更显著(P<10-9)。因此,20℃时等比重的0.5%布比卡因原液在冷却至5℃时似乎具有重比重溶液的特性。

相似文献

1
[The effect of the local anesthetic temperature on spinal anesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine].[局部麻醉剂温度对使用0.5%布比卡因的脊髓麻醉的影响]
Cah Anesthesiol. 1992;40(5):337-41.
2
The influence of epidural volume extension on spinal block with hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine for Caesarean delivery.硬膜外容积扩展对剖宫产术中高压布比卡因或普通布比卡因脊麻的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Apr;25(4):307-13. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507002670. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
3
[The effect of barbotage on the sensory spread in spinal anesthesia using isobaric and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine].[气泡注入法对使用等比重和重比重0.5%布比卡因进行脊髓麻醉时感觉平面扩散的影响]
Reg Anaesth. 1990 Sep;13(7):168-71.
4
[Isobaric and hyperbaric local anesthetic used in spinal anesthesia].[用于脊髓麻醉的等比重和高比重局部麻醉剂]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2005 Jun;30(3):325-7.
5
[Effect of intrathecal administration of sufentanil at different doses on bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy].不同剂量舒芬太尼鞘内给药对妇科腹腔镜手术布比卡因腰麻的影响
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008 Aug;28(8):1474-6.
6
Spinal anesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery.脊髓麻醉:盐酸罗哌卡因、布比卡因和左旋布比卡因用于下腹部手术的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2008;59(2):65-71.
7
[The effect of volume and dosage of isobaric bupivacaine on the sensory spread of spinal anesthesia].[等比重布比卡因容量和剂量对腰麻感觉平面扩散的影响]
Reg Anaesth. 1990 Sep;13(7):159-62.
8
Block distribution and cardiovascular effects of unilateral spinal anaesthesia by 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. A clinical comparison with bilateral spinal block.0.5% 重比重布比卡因单侧脊髓麻醉的阻滞分布及心血管效应。与双侧脊髓阻滞的临床比较。
Minerva Anestesiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;64(7-8):307-12.
9
Comparison of hemodynamic and anesthetic effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine and tetracaine in spinal anesthesia.高压氧下布比卡因和丁卡因用于脊髓麻醉时血流动力学及麻醉效果的比较
J Anesth. 2003;17(4):218-22. doi: 10.1007/s00540-003-0188-2.
10
Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block.低剂量右美托咪定或可乐定对布比卡因蛛网膜下腔阻滞特性的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Feb;50(2):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00919.x.