Suppr超能文献

瑞典猪源大肠杆菌三种不同STb检测方法的评估及五年间肠毒素模式的比较。

Evaluation of three different STb assays and comparison of enterotoxin pattern over a five-year period in Swedish porcine Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Handl C E, Olsson E, Flock J I

机构信息

Center for Biotechnology, Karolinska Institute, Novum, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;15(6):505-10. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90099-f.

Abstract

The pig intestinal loop (PIL) assay, inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and DNA hybridization assay were compared for analysis of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin b (STb) on 201 porcine E. coli strains. The DNA hybridization had a 95% correlation with the STb ELISA and was therefore chosen as the method for subsequent screening of enterotoxin genes: heat labile (LT), heat-stable a (STa), and/or STb. In contrast to the PIL assay, both the STb ELISA and DNA hybridization assays were more sensitive, reliable, reproducible, and showed good correlation with each other. Consequently, the STb ELISA is preferable for analysis of toxin preparations and screening of E. coli, whereas the DNA hybridization is better for large-scale epidemiologic screening. Escherichia coli strains (n = 437) associated with porcine diarrhea isolated in Sweden during 1989 were investigated. Of the strains, 135 (31%) were positive for at least one of these toxins and, therefore, designated enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC). Our results were compared with the enterotoxin pattern found in earlier studies of Swedish porcine strains. The only change in occurrence of toxins was found in strains isolated from piglets less than 1 week of age. LT- and STb-producing ETEC had decreased, and STa-producing ETEC had increased in prevalence. The occurrence of STb among ETEC of weaned pigs was 93%. This toxin was also found to be more common than STa when strains from all age groups were considered.

摘要

对201株猪源大肠杆菌菌株进行分析时,比较了猪肠袢(PIL)试验、抑制酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和DNA杂交测定,以检测大肠杆菌热稳定肠毒素b(STb)。DNA杂交与STb ELISA的相关性为95%,因此被选为后续筛选肠毒素基因(热不稳定毒素[LT]、热稳定毒素a[STa]和/或STb)的方法。与PIL试验不同,STb ELISA和DNA杂交测定都更灵敏、可靠、可重复,且相互之间具有良好的相关性。因此,STb ELISA更适合用于毒素制剂分析和大肠杆菌筛选,而DNA杂交更适合大规模流行病学筛查。对1989年在瑞典分离出的与猪腹泻相关的437株大肠杆菌菌株进行了研究。其中135株(31%)至少对其中一种毒素呈阳性,因此被认定为产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)。我们的结果与瑞典猪菌株早期研究中发现的肠毒素模式进行了比较。毒素出现情况的唯一变化见于小于1周龄仔猪分离出的菌株中。产LT和STb的ETEC有所减少,而产STa的ETEC患病率有所增加。断奶仔猪ETEC中STb的出现率为93%。当考虑所有年龄组的菌株时,还发现这种毒素比STa更常见。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验