Suppr超能文献

反比通气对严重呼吸衰竭患者心肺参数的影响。

Effects of inverse ratio ventilation on cardiorespiratory parameters in severe respiratory failure.

作者信息

Chan K, Abraham E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center.

出版信息

Chest. 1992 Nov;102(5):1556-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.5.1556.

Abstract

Inverse ratio ventilation, with prolonged inspiratory times, appears to improve gas exchange and arterial oxygenation in patients with severe respiratory failure; however, in previous studies, pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (PC-IRV), which uses a rapidly decelerating inspiratory flow pattern, was compared to conventional volume-controlled ventilation, which uses a constant inspiratory flow rate. Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), with a decelerating inspiratory flow pattern and conventional inspiratory-to-expiratory (I/E) ratios, also has been shown to produce improvement in PaO2 when compared to volume-controlled ventilation. It therefore is unknown if the potentially beneficial effects of PC-IRV are due to the reversal of I/E ratios or to the use of the rapidly decelerating inspiratory flow pattern. In order to investigate this issue, cardiorespiratory values were measured in ten patients with severe respiratory failure ventilated first with PCV, then PC-IRV, and finally with a second period of PCV. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, end-expiratory pressure, and fraction of oxygen in inspired gas (FIO2) were maintained at the same value for both ventilatory modalities. The PC-IRV was associated with significant increases in PaO2, arterial pH, and mean airway pressure. Significant decreases in pulmonary shunt fraction, PaCO2, and cardiac index were found with PC-IRV. No significant changes in tissue oxygen delivery or consumption occurred with either PCV or PC-IRV. These results demonstrate that inversion of conventional I/E ratios produces no significant improvement in the overall cardiorespiratory profile of critically ill patients. This study also suggests that the clinical utility of PC-IRV is limited except in the setting of the adult respiratory distress syndrome with hypoxemia or hypercapnia refractory to other therapeutic options.

摘要

反比通气,即延长吸气时间,似乎可改善严重呼吸衰竭患者的气体交换和动脉氧合;然而,在以往研究中,采用快速减速吸气气流模式的压力控制反比通气(PC - IRV)与采用恒定吸气流速的传统容量控制通气进行了比较。与容量控制通气相比,具有减速吸气气流模式和传统吸呼比(I/E)的压力控制通气(PCV)也已显示可使动脉血氧分压(PaO2)得到改善。因此,尚不清楚PC - IRV的潜在有益作用是由于I/E比值的逆转还是快速减速吸气气流模式的使用。为了研究这个问题,对10例严重呼吸衰竭患者进行了心肺参数测量,患者先接受PCV通气,然后接受PC - IRV通气,最后再接受一段时间的PCV通气。两种通气方式的潮气量、呼吸频率、呼气末压力和吸入气氧分数(FIO2)均维持在相同水平。PC - IRV与PaO2、动脉血pH值和平均气道压的显著升高相关。PC - IRV时肺分流分数、PaCO2和心脏指数显著降低。PCV或PC - IRV时组织氧输送或消耗均无显著变化。这些结果表明,传统I/E比值的逆转并未使危重症患者的整体心肺状况得到显著改善。本研究还提示,PC - IRV的临床应用有限,除非用于治疗对其他治疗方案无效的低氧血症或高碳酸血症的成人呼吸窘迫综合征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验