Kavanagh B, Anscher M, Leopold K, Deutsch M, Gaydica E, Dodge R, Allen K, Allen D, Staub W, Montana G
Dept of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;24(4):633-42. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90708-p.
From 1984-1990, 143 patients with squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled in a Phase I/II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without subsequent esophagectomy. Patients received one cycle of Cisplatin or Carboplatin plus Etoposide for squamous cell carcinoma, or Cisplatin or Carboplatin plus 5FU for adenocarcinoma, followed by two cycles of the same chemotherapy given concurrently with 44-46 Gy over 5 weeks. Operable patients then underwent esophagectomy. Inoperable patients and those with positive surgical margins received additional irradiation (16-18 Gy). Twelve percent of the surgical group received preoperative radiotherapy doses > or = 50 Gy. Seventy-two percent (103) had clinical Stage I-III tumors and 28% (40) were clinical Stage IV (1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria). Only clinical Stage I-III patients were analyzed with respect to patterns of failure. Isolated local failure occurred in 19/103 (18%) of clinical Stage I-III patients. Both local and distant relapse occurred in 15/103 (15%), and distant metastases alone occurred in 25/103 (24%). The 3-year actuarial rates of local and distant failures were 45% and 60%, respectively. Among the clinical Stage I-III patients who underwent surgery (n = 58) versus those who did not (n = 45), the 3-year actuarial local and distant failure rates were 30% versus 60% and 45% versus 45%, respectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of local control. For all clinical Stage I-III patients, treatment with surgery (p = 0.001) and with three or more cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of improved local control. Patients who underwent surgery were significantly younger and had a better performance status than those who did not. The improvement in local control with surgery did not translate into better survival, likely on account of a high operative mortality rate in older patients and those receiving > or = 50 Gy preoperatively. We conclude that local control remains poor with concurrent chemotherapy + radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The addition of surgery improved local control, but distant metastases remain a problem both in this group of patients as well as those treated without esophagectomy. Efforts to improve local control appear warranted, but it remains to be demonstrated that improved local control translates into improved survival in esophageal cancer because of a high rate of distant metastases in patients whose disease is controlled in the esophagus.
1984年至1990年,143例食管鳞状细胞癌或腺癌患者参加了一项I/II期研究,该研究采用新辅助化疗,随后进行同步化疗加放疗,部分患者后续接受食管切除术。鳞状细胞癌患者接受一个周期的顺铂或卡铂加依托泊苷治疗,腺癌患者接受顺铂或卡铂加5-氟尿嘧啶治疗,然后进行两个周期的相同化疗,并在5周内同步给予44 - 46 Gy的放疗。可手术的患者随后接受食管切除术。不可手术的患者以及手术切缘阳性的患者接受额外的放疗(16 - 18 Gy)。手术组中有12%的患者术前放疗剂量≥50 Gy。72%(103例)患者为临床I - III期肿瘤,28%(40例)为临床IV期(按照1983年美国癌症联合委员会标准)。仅对临床I - III期患者的失败模式进行了分析。临床I - III期患者中,19/103(18%)出现孤立性局部失败。15/103(15%)出现局部和远处复发,25/103(24%)仅出现远处转移。局部和远处失败的3年精算率分别为45%和60%。在接受手术的临床I - III期患者(n = 58)与未接受手术的患者(n = 45)中,3年精算局部和远处失败率分别为30%对60%以及45%对45%。进行多因素分析以确定局部控制的显著预测因素。对于所有临床I - III期患者,手术治疗(p = 0.001)以及三个或更多周期的化疗(p = 0.02)是局部控制改善的显著预测因素。接受手术的患者比未接受手术的患者明显更年轻且身体状况更好。手术带来的局部控制改善并未转化为更好的生存率,这可能是由于老年患者以及术前接受≥50 Gy放疗患者的手术死亡率较高。我们得出结论,同步化疗加放疗治疗食管癌的局部控制仍然较差。手术的加入改善了局部控制,但远处转移在这组患者以及未接受食管切除术的患者中仍然是个问题。努力改善局部控制似乎是有必要的,但由于食管癌患者中远处转移率较高,疾病在食管内得到控制的患者中局部控制改善是否能转化为生存率提高仍有待证实。