Haan G, van Steen R
Department of Health Economics, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hum Reprod. 1992 Aug;7(7):982-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137784.
A comparison has been made between in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and its most important alternative, tubal surgery. Medical results and financial costs have been taken into consideration. It is concluded that IVF must be regarded as a regular fertility treatment. The cost-effectiveness of IVF, in terms of the average treatment costs per full-term pregnancy, is approximately NLG 25,000, which is in line with that of tubal surgery. The deviation around the average is large, both for IVF and for tubal surgery.