Changes in motor responses induced by cerebellar stimulation during classical forelimb flexion conditioning in cat.

1. The ability of somaesthetic sensory inputs to produce structural changes in the connectivities of the central nervous structures involved in motor activity was tested with an alpha type of classical conditioning in chronically prepared adult cats. Repetitive sensory stimulation was applied at constant intervals after the activation of the motor circuits originating in the neurons or efferent axons of the cerebellar nuclei. A conditional stimulation (CS) applied to interpositus neurons was consistently paired with an unconditional stimulation (UCS) applied to the dorsal skin of the forelimb extremity to induce associative sensorimotor conditioning. The sites at which the conditional and unconditional stimuli were applied set up a simplified sensorimotor circuit including pathways transmitting both these stimuli and others mediating the expression of the conditioned responses. 2. To test the changes resulting from the conditioning, electrodes were implanted into the various relay structures on the cerebellar efferent pathways (ventrolateral nucleus motor cortex). The forelimb motor responses elicited by stimulating these relay structures were recorded with a potentiometer placed at the elbow joint. The angular displacement (amplitude) and latency of the responses and the percentage response rates were systematically quantified throughout the conditioning procedure and at test sessions carried out after the daily conditioning routines. 3. It was observed that daily repetition of paired CS-UCS led to an increase in the response rates and amplitudes of the forelimb flexions, which already began to occur very slightly on the first 4 or 5 days in response to the alpha conditioning, whereas the CS when applied alone failed to produce any changes in this initial response. Likewise, after the acquisition phase, repeated presentation of either the CS alone or the CS preceded by the UCS led to the extinction of the conditioned response, thus indicating that the observed changes were of an associative nature and that they depended on interactions between the motor and sensory inputs occurring somewhere in the CNS. In fact, the effects of conditioning were not generalized, but involved only a circumscribed circuit originating in the cerebellar neurons stimulated by the CS, which were activated concomitantly with the sensory pathways. 4. The conditioned response amplitudes were enhanced by 2.5-3 times their initial value. This enhancement persisted at the end of acquisition or after several days of consolidation, even when the paired CS-UCS sessions were interrupted for a period of 15 days to 2 mo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)