Dretchen K L, Balter N J, Schwartz S L, Boll T J, Magrab P, Molinari G F, Benedek E P, Hershkowitz N, Fink J N, Witorsch P
Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.
J Occup Med. 1992 Nov;34(11):1106-13. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199211000-00014.
This case illustrates a comprehensive approach to assessing causality in a woman with apparent cognitive dysfunction, as measured by neuropsychological testing, and a 10-year history of occupational exposure to ethylene oxide. The analysis included a multidisciplinary examination of the patient, which took place several years after the termination of her exposure. In addition, all of the patient's prior medical and psychiatric records were reviewed, as were the records of her employer to ascertain her exposure history. Our evaluation revealed a pattern of neuropsychological findings not consistent with nervous system damage secondary to an organic effect of ethylene oxide. A more likely causal hypothesis is adopted: the patient's apparent cognitive dysfunction had a psychiatric etiology. This case also illustrates the potential impact of a patient's involvement in legal proceedings related to claims of neurocognitive dysfunction.
该病例展示了一种综合方法,用于评估一名女性的因果关系。该女性经神经心理学测试显示存在明显的认知功能障碍,且有10年职业接触环氧乙烷的历史。分析包括对患者进行多学科检查,这是在她接触终止数年后进行的。此外,还查阅了患者所有既往的医疗和精神科记录,以及其雇主的记录以确定她的接触史。我们的评估显示,神经心理学检查结果的模式与环氧乙烷有机效应继发的神经系统损害不一致。因此采用了一个更有可能的因果假设:患者明显的认知功能障碍有精神病因。该病例还说明了患者参与与神经认知功能障碍索赔相关法律程序的潜在影响。