• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌切除术后生存相关因素:903例分析

Factors related to survival following resection for gastric carcinoma: analysis of 903 cases.

作者信息

Serlin O, Keehn R J, Higgins G A, Harrower H W, Mendeloff G L

出版信息

Cancer. 1977 Sep;40(3):1318-29. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197709)40:3<1318::aid-cncr2820400349>3.0.co;2-9.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(197709)40:3<1318::aid-cncr2820400349>3.0.co;2-9
PMID:143340
Abstract

This report is based on 903 patients with resections for gastric carcinoma between October 1957, and July 1969, entered in controlled trials of adjuvant therapy with Thio-TEPA and FUDR. Neither Thio-TEPA nor FUDR, as administered, prolonged survival. The extent of disease at the time of curative surgery is related to survival for the first 36 months postoperatively. Involvement of lymph nodes, resection of the esophagus, and serosal penetration are predictive of recurrence up to 36 months. There appear to be three groups of patients: 1) Cured (26%); 2) Slowly growing tumor--23% (median survival, 25 months); and 3) Rapidly growing tumor--51% (median survival, eight months). The absence of blood-vessel invasion, lymphatic invasion, lymph-node involvement, and serosal penetration characterize those patients in Group A.

摘要

本报告基于1957年10月至1969年7月间903例行胃癌切除术的患者,这些患者参与了硫替派和氟尿苷辅助治疗的对照试验。所给予的硫替派和氟尿苷均未延长生存期。根治性手术时的疾病范围与术后前36个月的生存期相关。淋巴结受累、食管切除和浆膜侵犯可预测36个月内的复发情况。患者似乎可分为三组:1)治愈组(26%);2)肿瘤生长缓慢组——23%(中位生存期25个月);3)肿瘤生长迅速组——51%(中位生存期8个月)。A组患者的特征为无血管侵犯、淋巴侵犯、淋巴结受累和浆膜侵犯。

相似文献

1
Factors related to survival following resection for gastric carcinoma: analysis of 903 cases.胃癌切除术后生存相关因素:903例分析
Cancer. 1977 Sep;40(3):1318-29. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197709)40:3<1318::aid-cncr2820400349>3.0.co;2-9.
2
Prognosis of gastric cancer patients with node-negative metastasis following curative resection: outcomes of the survival and recurrence.胃癌根治性切除术后淋巴结阴性转移患者的预后:生存与复发结果
Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;22(10):835-9. doi: 10.1155/2008/761821.
3
The use of triethylenethiophosphoramide as an adjuvant to the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma.硫替派作为胃癌手术治疗辅助剂的应用。
Ann Surg. 1968 Mar;167(3):293-312. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196803000-00001.
4
[Surgical treatment and prognosis of Borrmann type IIII( gastric cancer involving the whole stomach].[Borrmann Ⅳ型(全胃癌)的外科治疗与预后]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):185-189.
5
A prospective study of gastric cancer. 'Real' 5-year survival rates and mortality rates in a country with high incidence.一项关于胃癌的前瞻性研究。一个高发病率国家的“真实”5年生存率和死亡率。
Dig Surg. 1998;15(4):317-22. doi: 10.1159/000018645.
6
The prognostic analysis of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients following curative resection.淋巴结阳性胃癌患者根治性切除术后的预后分析。
J Surg Res. 2010 Jun 1;161(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.12.019. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
7
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in gastric cancer with serosal invasion: significance in patients chosen for multivariate analysis.术后辅助化疗对伴有浆膜侵犯的胃癌有效:对多变量分析中所选患者的意义
Oncol Rep. 2002 Jul-Aug;9(4):801-6.
8
[Surgical adjuvant chemotherapy of stomach cancer, with special reference to follow-up study of thio-TEPA and future problems].[胃癌的手术辅助化疗,特别提及硫代乙撑亚胺的随访研究及未来问题]
Gan No Rinsho. 1969 May;15(5):474-9.
9
The effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃腺癌患者生存率的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jul;181(1):56-64.
10
Pathological serosa and node-based classification accurately predicts gastric cancer recurrence risk and outcome, and determines potential and limitation of a Japanese-style extensive surgery for Western patients: a prospective with quality control 10-year follow-up study.基于病理浆膜和淋巴结的分类可准确预测胃癌复发风险和预后,并确定日式扩大手术对西方患者的潜在价值和局限性:一项具有质量控制的前瞻性10年随访研究。
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;84(12):1602-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1720.

引用本文的文献

1
MAGED4B is a Poor Prognostic Marker of Stomach Adenocarcinoma and a Potential Therapeutic Target for Stomach Adenocarcinoma Tumorigenesis.MAGED4B是胃腺癌的不良预后标志物及胃腺癌肿瘤发生的潜在治疗靶点。
Int J Gen Med. 2023 May 6;16:1681-1693. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S401507. eCollection 2023.
2
ADENOCARCINOMA STOMACH A REVIEW OF 168 CASES.胃腺癌:168例病例回顾
Med J Armed Forces India. 1994 Apr;50(2):89-91. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)31005-5. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of CD24 overexpression in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
CD24过表达在胃癌患者中的临床病理特征及预后意义:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 12;9(12):e114746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114746. eCollection 2014.
4
Proposal of a risk score for recurrence in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.关于根治性切除胃癌患者复发风险评分的提议。
Surg Today. 1993;23(9):759-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00311616.
5
Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 3926 gastric cancer patients.对3926例胃癌患者进行多因素分析的显著预后因素。
World J Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;18(6):872-7; discussion 877-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00299091.
6
Adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer.
World J Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;19(2):221-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00308630.
7
Carcinoma of the stomach. Why are we falling to improve survival?胃癌。我们为何未能提高生存率?
Ann Surg. 1981 Apr;193(4):407-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198104000-00003.
8
Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer.胃癌胃切除术中切缘的充分性
Ann Surg. 1982 Dec;196(6):685-90. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198212001-00012.
9
The concept of immunochemosurgery in gastric cancer.
World J Surg. 1987 Aug;11(4):465-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01655811.
10
Lymph node involvement as the only prognostic factor in curative resected gastric carcinoma: a multivariate analysis.
World J Surg. 1989 Jan-Feb;13(1):118-23; discussion 123. doi: 10.1007/BF01671171.