• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An evaluation of provider-related and disease-related morbidity in a level I university trauma service: directions for quality improvement.

作者信息

Hoyt D B, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Fortlage D, Davis J W, Mackersie R C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1992 Oct;33(4):586-601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199210000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199210000-00016
PMID:1433407
Abstract

As the number of preventable trauma-related deaths plateaus as a result of trauma system development, new directions for quality improvement in trauma care must come from analyzing morbidity with standardized methods to establish thresholds for provider-related and disease-specific complications. To establish such thresholds and determine priorities for improvements in quality all trauma patients who died, who were admitted to the ICU or OR, who were hospitalized for more than 3 days, or who were interfacility transfers to an academic trauma service, were concurrently evaluated for 1 year. All complication events were defined, reviewed, tabulated, and classified using 135 categories of complications. These categories were subdivided into provider-specific and disease-specific complications. Provider-related complications were classified as justified or unjustified to allow identification of events with a potential for improvement. A total of 1108 patients were admitted (mean ISS, 17); there were 97 deaths. Three potentially preventable deaths were identified, 857 complication events were identified, and 285 provider-related complications were responsible for errors with potential for improvement in 59 events (21%). Disease-specific morbidity was primarily related to infection; pneumonia accounted for 36% of all infectious complications and systemic infection for only 8.6% of infectious complications. Organ failure and other major systemic complications occurred in 2%-8% of patients. This type of analysis forms the basis on which to determine thresholds of provider-specific and disease-specific morbidity in a trauma hospital and serves as a guide to direct efforts toward continuous quality improvement.

摘要

相似文献

1
An evaluation of provider-related and disease-related morbidity in a level I university trauma service: directions for quality improvement.
J Trauma. 1992 Oct;33(4):586-601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199210000-00016.
2
A twelve-year analysis of disease and provider complications on an organized level I trauma service: as good as it gets?对一级有组织创伤服务中疾病和医疗人员并发症的十二年分析:这是最好的情况了吗?
J Trauma. 2003 Jan;54(1):26-36; discussion 36-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00004.
3
Analysis of recurrent process errors leading to provider-related complications on an organized trauma service: directions for care improvement.对导致有组织创伤服务中与提供者相关并发症的反复出现的流程错误的分析:改善护理的方向。
J Trauma. 1994 Mar;36(3):377-84. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199403000-00017.
4
An analysis of errors causing morbidity and mortality in a trauma system: a guide for quality improvement.
J Trauma. 1992 May;32(5):660-5; discussion 665-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199205000-00020.
5
Evaluation of autopsy reports in terms of preventability of traumatic deaths.从创伤性死亡的可预防性角度评估尸检报告。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Mar;21(2):127-33. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.94658.
6
Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: the argument for injury prevention.一级创伤中心的753例连续死亡病例:预防伤害的理由
J Trauma. 2003 Jan;54(1):66-70; discussion 70-1. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00009.
7
Preventable morbidity at a mature trauma center.一家成熟创伤中心的可预防发病率
Arch Surg. 2009 Jun;144(6):536-41; discussion 541-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.82.
8
Performance and consistency of care in admitted trauma patients: our next great opportunity in trauma care?创伤住院患者护理的绩效与一致性:这会是我们在创伤护理领域的下一个重大机遇吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Jun;79(6):443-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04946.x.
9
Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center.一家成熟创伤中心的可预防或潜在可预防死亡率。
J Trauma. 2007 Dec;63(6):1338-46; discussion 1346-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815078ae.
10
Effect of surgical panel composition on patient outcome at a level I trauma center.外科手术团队组成对一级创伤中心患者预后的影响。
Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;133(8):847-54. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.8.847.

引用本文的文献

1
US pediatric trauma patient unplanned 30-day readmissions.美国儿科创伤患者的非计划30天再入院情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):765-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
2
Delays in diagnosis in early trauma care: evaluation of diagnostic efficiency and circumstances of delay.早期创伤护理中的诊断延迟:诊断效率及延迟情况评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Apr;38(2):139-49. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0129-y. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
3
Pediatric trauma care with computed tomography--criteria for CT scanning.小儿创伤的计算机断层扫描护理——CT扫描标准
Emerg Radiol. 2015 Dec;22(6):613-21. doi: 10.1007/s10140-015-1332-7. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
4
Preventable mortality in geriatric hip fracture inpatients.老年髋部骨折住院患者的可预防死亡率。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Sep;96-B(9):1178-84. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.32814.
5
[Assessment of prehospital injury severity in children: challenge for emergency physicians].[儿童院前损伤严重程度评估:急诊医生面临的挑战]
Anaesthesist. 2013 May;62(5):380-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2176-8. Epub 2013 May 10.
6
Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review.确定重症监护病房出院计划工具:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 5;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002653. Print 2013.
7
Developing a patient and family-centred approach for measuring the quality of injury care: a study protocol.制定以患者和家属为中心的方法来衡量创伤护理质量:研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 27;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-31.
8
Complication rates as a trauma care performance indicator: a systematic review.作为创伤护理绩效指标的并发症发生率:一项系统综述。
Crit Care. 2012 Oct 16;16(5):R195. doi: 10.1186/cc11680.
9
[Preclinical prediction of prehospital injury severity by emergency physicians : approach to evaluate validity].急诊医师对院前损伤严重程度的临床前预测:评估有效性的方法
Anaesthesist. 2011 Jun;60(6):534-40. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1846-z. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
10
[External quality management in the clinical treatment of severely injured patients].[严重创伤患者临床治疗中的外部质量管理]
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Oct;107(10):835-43. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0814-y.