• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择反应任务中刺激和反应特征的显著性。

Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.

作者信息

Reeve T G, Proctor R W, Weeks D J, Dornier L

机构信息

Motor Behavior Center, Auburn University, AL 36849-5323.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1992 Oct;52(4):453-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03206705.

DOI:10.3758/bf03206705
PMID:1437478
Abstract

A pattern of differential reaction time (RT) benefits obtained in spatial-precuing tasks has been attributed to translation processes that operate on mental codes formed to represent the stimulus and response sets. According to the salient-features coding principle, the codes are based on the salient stimulus and response features, with RTs being fastest when the two sets of features correspond. Three experiments are reported in which the stimulus and response sets were manipulated using Gestalt grouping principles. In the first two experiments, stimuli and responses were grouped according to spatial proximity, whereas in the last experiment, they were grouped according to similarity. With both types of manipulations, the grouping of the stimulus set systematically affected the pattern of precuing benefits. Thus, in these experiments, the organization of the stimulus set was the primary determinant of the features selected for coding the stimulus and response sets in the translation process.

摘要

在空间线索任务中获得的差异反应时(RT)优势模式,被归因于对为表征刺激和反应集而形成的心理代码进行操作的转换过程。根据显著特征编码原则,这些代码基于显著的刺激和反应特征,当两组特征对应时,反应时最快。本文报告了三个实验,其中使用格式塔分组原则对刺激和反应集进行了操纵。在前两个实验中,刺激和反应根据空间接近度进行分组,而在最后一个实验中,它们根据相似性进行分组。通过这两种类型的操纵,刺激集的分组系统地影响了线索提示优势的模式。因此,在这些实验中,刺激集的组织是在转换过程中为编码刺激和反应集而选择的特征的主要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.选择反应任务中刺激和反应特征的显著性。
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Oct;52(4):453-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03206705.
2
The acquisition of task-specific productions and modifications of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks.空间线索任务中特定任务产物的习得以及陈述性表征的修改。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Jun;117(2):182-96. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.117.2.182.
3
Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.规划按键和伸手反应:反应位置及潜在效应器数量的影响
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1464-78. doi: 10.1037/a0011975.
4
Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.双重任务中的任务集惯性和记忆巩固瓶颈
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):448-58. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0020-8. Epub 2005 Oct 8.
5
Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.四选任务双任务表现中一致刺激-反应映射获益的决定因素。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 May;71(4):734-56. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.734.
6
Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks.纯刺激-反应映射和任务与混合刺激-反应映射和任务在反应选择上的年龄差异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
7
Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: abstract spatial coding in dual tasks.正交跨任务兼容性:双重任务中的抽象空间编码
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):45-50. doi: 10.3758/bf03194026.
8
Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.三项选择任务双任务表现中一致空间映射益处的决定因素。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1771-81. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1771.
9
The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions.二维刺激-反应相容性中的患病率效应是维度相对显著性的函数。
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):815-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03194748.
10
Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.社会西蒙任务中空间显著性的增强:空间兼容性效应的反应编码解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):911-29. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0304-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A deficit in older adults' effortful selection of cued responses.老年人在有提示的反应中进行刻意选择时存在缺陷。
J Mot Behav. 2006 Jul;38(4):265-84. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.38.4.265-284.
2
Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.一致的刺激-反应映射对双任务表现有益的紧急知觉特征。
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):468-83. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0021-7. Epub 2005 Oct 8.
3
Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

本文引用的文献

1
S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.S-R兼容性:刺激和反应代码中配对元素之间的对应关系。
J Exp Psychol. 1954 Dec;48(6):483-92. doi: 10.1037/h0054967.
2
S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.S-R兼容性:刺激与反应编码的空间特征。
J Exp Psychol. 1953 Sep;46(3):199-210. doi: 10.1037/h0062827.
3
Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors.由于效应器相对位置的编码而产生的兼容性。
正交刺激-反应兼容性效应背后的刺激与反应表征
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):45-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03196468.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1984 Oct;57(2):133-43. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(84)90039-8.
4
Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output.人类信息处理的离散阶段模型与连续阶段模型:寻找部分输出
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Apr;8(2):273-96. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.273.
5
On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.关于离散手指反应的预先准备。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Aug;10(4):541-53. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.4.541.
6
S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.S-R兼容性与反应编码的概念
J Exp Psychol. 1971 Jun;88(3):354-60. doi: 10.1037/h0030892.
7
Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility.空间关系与刺激-反应兼容性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1972 Feb;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(72)90040-6.
8
The acquisition of task-specific productions and modifications of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks.空间线索任务中特定任务产物的习得以及陈述性表征的修改。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Jun;117(2):182-96. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.117.2.182.
9
The legacy of Gestalt psychology.
Sci Am. 1990 Dec;263(6):84-90. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1290-84.
10
Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.维度重叠:刺激-反应兼容性的认知基础——一个模型与分类法
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253.