• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.

作者信息

Hansen E K

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Technology, Royal Dental College, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Dent Res. 1992 Aug;100(4):244-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01751.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01751.x
PMID:1439532
Abstract

The cumulative retention rate of a microfilled resin in non-undercut cervical abrasion/erosion lesions was studied over a 5-yr period. The enamel was etched and the dentin was pretreated with either Gluma (n = 75) or the first marketed version of Scotchbond (n = 30). The cumulative 5-yr retention rate of the Gluma fillings was 90% and that of the Scotchbond fillings 47% (the 95% confidence limits were 83-98% for Gluma fillings and 27-67% for Scotchbond fillings). The retention rate with both bonding agents was significantly higher in the maxillary arch than in the mandibular arch.

摘要

相似文献

1
Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
Scand J Dent Res. 1992 Aug;100(4):244-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01751.x.
2
A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions.对用于修复宫颈糜烂的Gluma和Gluma/Scotchbond进行的3年评估。
Scand J Dent Res. 1990 Aug;98(4):341-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00982.x.
3
A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.对非龋性颈部病变中三步法牙本质黏结剂的12年临床评估。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 May;140(5):526-35. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0220.
4
Three-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.使用树脂和牙本质粘结剂修复宫颈糜烂的三年研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 1989 Oct;47(5):301-6. doi: 10.3109/00016358909007716.
5
Marginal seal of new-generation dental bonding agents.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct;72(4):420-3. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90563-0.
6
An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions.宫颈病变中不同粘结修复体的评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Mar;65(3):341-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90222-i.
7
3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.改良型Gluma粘结系统用于宫颈磨损/糜烂病变的3年临床评估
Am J Dent. 1996 Feb;9(1):22-6.
8
Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.与宫颈磨损/糜烂修复临床成功相关的因素。
Oper Dent. 1995 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-13.
9
Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results.两种牙本质黏结剂的临床性能:2年随访结果
Aust Dent J. 1996 Oct;41(5):324-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1996.tb03141.x.
10
Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems.含丁香酚的临时黏固剂对牙本质黏接系统疗效的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 1999 Feb;107(1):65-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107110.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Different Occlusal Loading on Six Restorative Materials for Restoration of Abfraction Lesions-Finite Element Analysis.不同咬合负荷对六种用于修复牙体楔状缺损的修复材料的影响——有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2022 Oct;16(4):886-894. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741376. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
2
Abfraction: A review.磨损:综述
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013 May;17(2):222-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.119788.
3
What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.哪种补牙材料?牙齿修复的最佳实践。
Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):202-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.202.