Rosenthal P, Jennings M T
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, California.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Nov;87(11):1575-9.
To compare fecal occult blood tests (Hemoccult II, Hemoccult SENSA, HemeSelect) for detecting the presence of occult gastrointestinal bleeding in a pediatric population at high risk, we analyzed stool specimens from 100 children who followed a restricted diet. Forty-two children had upper and 58 lower gastrointestinal sources of bleeding. Positivity rates ranged from 10.8% to 26% dependent upon the occult blood test. Whereas Hemoccult II and Hemoccult SENSA slides detected several positive specimens in upper gastrointestinal bleeding sources, all HemeSelect slides were negative in these subjects. In lower gastrointestinal bleeding, HemeSelect slides were positive in 26.8% of samples as opposed to 15.9% and 17.5% positivity rates for Hemoccult II and Hemoccult SENSA, but this difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that fecal occult blood tests vary, depending upon the origin of bleeding. Our results favor use of Hemoccult SENSA slides for suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding and HemeSelect slides for lower gastrointestinal bleeding in children. However, if only one all-purpose fecal occult blood test is to be utilized, then our data supports the use of Hemoccult SENSA slides for children.
为比较粪便潜血试验(隐血 II 型、隐血 SENSA 型、血红素选择型)在检测高危儿科人群隐匿性胃肠道出血方面的效果,我们分析了 100 名遵循特定饮食的儿童的粪便样本。42 名儿童有上消化道出血源,58 名有下消化道出血源。根据潜血试验的不同,阳性率在 10.8%至 26%之间。虽然隐血 II 型和隐血 SENSA 型载玻片在上消化道出血源中检测到了一些阳性样本,但在这些受试者中,所有血红素选择型载玻片均为阴性。在下消化道出血中,血红素选择型载玻片在 26.8%的样本中呈阳性,而隐血 II 型和隐血 SENSA 型的阳性率分别为 15.9%和 17.5%,但这种差异无统计学意义。我们得出结论,粪便潜血试验因出血来源而异。我们的结果支持在怀疑上消化道出血时使用隐血 SENSA 型载玻片,在儿童下消化道出血时使用血红素选择型载玻片。然而,如果只使用一种通用的粪便潜血试验,那么我们的数据支持在儿童中使用隐血 SENSA 型载玻片。